Search for: "J. DOES, 1-99"
Results 61 - 80
of 614
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2020, 5:24 pm
§§ 922(g) (felon in possession of firearms) and 922(j) (knowingly trafficking in stolen firearms). [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
According to AG Wathelet, we only know that Option 1 does not apply, i.e. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 11:58 pm
Die Einspruchsabteilung hat in der angefochtenen Entscheidung den Einspruch nach Artikel 99(1), Regel 77(1) EPÜ verworfen, weil die Identität der Einsprechenden aus den bis zum Ablauf der Einspruchsfrist vorgelegten Dokumenten nicht eindeutig feststellbar sei. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:07 pm
ECF No. 3 at 14, ¶ 99. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
In the present case, the debit order does not explicitly refer to any decision, nor does it contain a request defining the subject of the appeal. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
99 Va. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Public speakers (IRPR, s 186(j)). [read post]
16 Jun 2018, 12:25 pm
Consequently, Males J concluded that [99] […] there is nothing in the Recast Regulation to cast doubt on the continuing validity of the decision [in West Tankers] which remains an authoritative statement of EU law. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 5:54 am
Nagin & J. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 2:46 pm
By Katherine J. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:00 pm
& Mary Bill Rights J. 893, 898–99 (2007). [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:12 pm
Table 1 lists “darunavir,” along with the CAS registry number “206361-99-1. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 2:04 pm
See also J. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 2:04 pm
See also J. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
Defendants note that RIME’s signature does not appear·anywhere on the “Vandal Eyes”mural. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 3:01 pm
It was already decided in J 19/90 [2.1.2 to 2.1.4] that merely paying the fee for appeal does not constitute a valid lodging of an appeal. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 3:08 pm
“Z&J Technologies GmbH”. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 8:27 pm
[amended 12/99] 15. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 7:55 am
A Jan. 1, 2003, Indiana Supreme Court ruling changed how jury pools were selected within the Hoosier state. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
Additionally, it underscores that judicial findings of fact must be based upon all of the evidence.Joint authorship – the law (now succinctly summarised at [53])The court considered the well-established elements of joint authorship under s.10(1) CDPA 1988 in turn: (1) collaboration; (2) authorship; (3) contribution and (4) non-distinctness of contribution, although the focus was on the first three.1. [read post]
