Search for: "J. G.1" Results 41 - 60 of 4,348
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2018, 3:22 am by Nico Cordes
, within the 1 month of entering the regional phase before the EPO .A question arising in the present case is whether reestablishment is available for the request for restoration of priority. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 12:02 pm by Patricia Hughes
In G, Karakatsanis J., writing for the same judges constituting the majority in Fraser, reviewed the interpretative territory of section 15(1) in paragraphs 39 to 47, stressing the significance of recognizing adverse impact discrimination and substantive equality. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 10:41 am by Joanna Herzik
Effective December 1, 2013, the following rules have been amended: Appellate Rules 13, 14, 24, 28 and 28.1 and Form 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure Fifth Circuit Rules 28.2.2 and 28.3 (g) (h) (i) (j) (k) (l) and (m) and Fifth Circuit Form 7 View the full set of changes here. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
J 10/01 [15-20], J 24/03 [4], J 18/04 [2.1], J 7/05 [3] and G 1/09 [3.2.4]. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 1:22 pm
Three public hearings have been scheduled by the Commission on Judicial Appointments, for July 26 in San Francisco and July 30 in Los Angeles, to consider the following appointments by Governor Brown:On July 26 starting at 1 p.m. in the Supreme Court Courtroom, 350 McAllister Street in San Francisco:1-1:30Justice Peter Siggins, as Presiding Justice of the Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, Division Three (San Francisco)Commission members: Chief Justice Tani… [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:27 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Criminal Procedure Sentencing; substitution of judge Kacey G. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
[3] The Board finds that this question has already been answered by decision G 1/09 of the Enlarged Board of Appeal (EBA) dated 27 September 2010. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
A communication under R 108(3) is due from the EPO only in case of loss of rights under paragraph 1 or 2 of that Rule, which does not encompass the lack of payment of the renewal fee in respect of the third year due upon entry into the regional phase under R 107(1)(g). [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 7:50 am
 J 21/80, J 16/82, T 324/90, and T 239/92 ). [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
After G 1/09 had issued, there was quite some speculation on whether its verdict could be transferred to the case of deemed withdrawal. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:40 am by Emmanuel Barthe
Et profitez-en pour répondre à son sondage sur ce moment où vous cliquez sur la case à cocher précédant "j'ai lu et j'accepte les conditions générales" (...) [read post]