Search for: "J. P." Results 81 - 100 of 14,438
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2024, 4:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Jones Law Firm, P.C. v J Synergy Green, Inc. 2024 NY Slip Op 31127(U) April 2, 2024Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 653730/2023 Judge: Lyle E. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 10:32 am
 Pix credit here The question of the photograph has been at the center of modernity, and now deeply embedded in the reconsideration of the intersubjectivity of the person (and social collectives)  in their encounters with the simulacra of the virtual and its generative consciousness (Jan Broekman, Knowledge in Change (Springer, 2023); Larry Catá Backer, 'The Soulful Machine' Int'l J. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am by centerforartlaw
By Irina Strelkovskaya Background Yulia Tsvetkova is an artist and LGBTQ+ and women’s rights activist from Komsomolsk-on-Amur, in the Far East of the Russian Federation. [1] In 2018, Tsvetkova began her activism and opened a city community center for civic initiatives, where she hosted weekly lectures, called “Living Library” sessions, to support groups for schoolchildren and mothers. [2] Also, in 2018, Yulia and her mother, Anna Khodyreva, organized a theater studio for… [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 4:08 pm by admin
One standard text on the ethical conduct of research reports that peer review is often ineffective or incompetent, and that it may not even catch simple statistical or methodological errors.[9] According to the authors, Shamoo and Resnik: “[p]eer review is not good at detecting data fabrication or falsification partly because reviewers usually do not have access to the material they would need to detect fraud, such as the original data, protocols, and standard operating procedures. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:15 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Nevertheless, the issue triggered enough of a rise from the Justices to add footnote 14 as follows: “Although we do not consider the Board's new theory, [use of addition method over the CVC,] we would be remiss in failing to comment on the fact that the Board attempted to support its position by relying on the schedule for rating permanent disabilities dated April 1997 (1997 Schedule), relying on language not existent in the 2005 Schedule, and cases predating the 2004 legislative… [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 7:11 am by Rick Hasen
NYT: Covert Chinese accounts are masquerading online as American supporters of former President Donald J. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
Our constitutional order contains an “anti-power-accumulation principle. [read post]