Search for: "J. R." Results 21 - 40 of 43,421
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Accordingly, the appeal has to be assessed on the basis of the legal provisions which were in force at the filing date of the present application, i.e. on 17 February 2010 (for details see J 7/11 [2]). [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 9:28 am
Practice Tip #1: A recent complaint filed by a different intellectual property attorney for J & J Sports deviated from the standard format of J & J Sports' complaints. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Interruption of proceedings[2] R 142(1)(b) provides that:Proceedings before the EPO shall be interrupted … in the event of the applicant (condition A), as a result of some action taken against his property (condition C), being prevented by legal reasons (condition B) from continuing the proceedings.[3] An examination of the question of interruption based on these three conditions A, B and C was developed by the Legal Board in its decisions J 9/94 and J 10/94. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 10:11 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - J & J Sports Productions, Inc. of Campbell, California ("J & J Sports") has sued Joseph M. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The same is true where, as in the present case, the description referred to Figures 1 to 11, but no Figure 11 was filed: Figure 11 was clearly missing (see also J 15/12). [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In decision J 16/96 the Board did not have to consider the question of whether LPs could be members of an association pursuant to R 101(9) because all the members of the association under consideration were professional representatives.[2.7] Decision J 16/96 [2] expressed the opinion that the DecInt was not binding on the Boards but that it was to be taken into account when interpreting R 101(9) EPC 1973. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:21 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - An intellectual property attorney for J & J Sports Production, Inc. of Campbell, California ("J & J Sports") sued Minerva Soriano and Soriano's Mexican Restaurant, LLC, both d/b/a Soriano's Mexican Restaurant of Indianapolis, Indiana, in the Southern District of Indiana. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:10 pm
Here is an interview with Broussard-David attorney J. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 1:36 pm
  J&R has also lowered their everday price for Naxos releases back to $6.99 (they had been at 7.99 for a while). [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The present case can therefore be distinguished from those in G 1/09 and J 4/11 but the principles established by those cases can nevertheless be applied to the present case.[5.1] As to the position immediately after the application was withdrawn and before any request for correction under R 139 was filed, the effect of the filing of the withdrawal was that the application was thereupon withdrawn. [read post]