Search for: "J. R. C."
Results 21 - 40
of 9,819
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
Thus, apart from R 30 itself, the Decision of the President of the EPO dated 12 July 2007 concerning the filing of sequence listings (OJ EPO 2007, special edition No. 3, C.1, p. 26) is of relevance. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:34 am
Il y a un peu plus d'un an, j'avais signalé la mise en ligne par le blog IPKat d'une décision de la Chambre de recours disciplinaire sur le problème de notation de l'épreuve C 2007. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 5:13 am
R. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 2:52 am
R-Boc Reps., Inc., No. 7 C 1763, Slip Op. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 2:52 am
R-Boc Reps., Inc., No. 7 C 1763, Slip Op. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
§ 553 (c)(2)(C). [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 11:00 am
J. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 3:10 am
Photo (c) Donald J. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
The same is true where, as in the present case, the description referred to Figures 1 to 11, but no Figure 11 was filed: Figure 11 was clearly missing (see also J 15/12). [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 10:04 am
R. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 3:15 am
Legal Educ. 373 (2018) Steven C. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:19 am
J.). [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 9:02 am
Blaine Bookey, Gender-Based Asylum Post-Matter of A-R-C-G: Evolving Standards and Fair Application of the Law, 22 Southwestern J. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 5:52 pm
Nos seis primeiros meses deste ano, o valor médio das compras femininas na rede foi de R$ 272,00 enquanto que os homens gastaram R$ 375,00, 38% a mais. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
The present case can therefore be distinguished from those in G 1/09 and J 4/11 but the principles established by those cases can nevertheless be applied to the present case.[5.1] As to the position immediately after the application was withdrawn and before any request for correction under R 139 was filed, the effect of the filing of the withdrawal was that the application was thereupon withdrawn. [read post]
7 May 2012, 7:59 am
C. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 1:17 am
On 1 November 2017, the Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeal in R (C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 72, relating to whether, in the context of awarding Jobseeker’s Allowance (‘JSA’), the State unjustifiably interfered with the right of transgender persons to have information about their gender reassignment kept private. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
In decision J 16/96 the Board did not have to consider the question of whether LPs could be members of an association pursuant to R 101(9) because all the members of the association under consideration were professional representatives.[2.7] Decision J 16/96 [2] expressed the opinion that the DecInt was not binding on the Boards but that it was to be taken into account when interpreting R 101(9) EPC 1973. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 7:15 am
R. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 6:18 am
John R. [read post]
