Search for: "J. S. In Re: A. L. v. Department of Public Welfare (Majority Opinion)"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
Greg Abbott’s campaign representative (Abbott is standing for re-election in 2022) Dave Carney casually confessed that the governor was pursuing this issue because “it’s a 75% to 80% winner” at the polls. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
Hunter's dissenting opinion, and held that STATE v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Garland has spent most of his career in public service, much like Justice Samuel Alito. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 am
The Honorable Mark J. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 2:05 pm
See also Richard J. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
It is therefore important to adopt measures to protect the general welfare and the interest of the collectivity as a whole under the concept of public order (ordre public). [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:44 am
Alexis de Tocqueville, Of the Use Which Americans Make of Public Associations and Civic Life, Section 2, Chapter V in Democracy in America, Volume II (1840). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
See also Comm’rs of Parks & Boulevards of City of Detroit v Moesta, 91 Mich 149, 152-53; 51 NW 903 (1892); In re Edward J. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm
” Douglas Laycock, Regulatory Exemptions of Religious Behavior and the Original Understanding of the Establishment Clause, 81 Notre Dame L. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Reg’l. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
As is the larger point: ideological ossification and institutional rigidity may produce a substantial downward pressure on the welfare of the social collective; but that pressure may be resisted by the power of rigidity and ossification, if that provides a sufficient basis for collective solidarity by those with the power to maintain the system.The essay follows below in the original Spanish and in a a crude English translation. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:59 am
They're also not interested in growth at all costs. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
“If allowed to stand, the injunction would encourage courts to use vague public nuisance standards to scuttle the nation’s carefully created system for accommodating the need for energy production and the need for clean air,” appeals court Judge J. [read post]
