Search for: "J. T. v. District of Columbia" Results 21 - 40 of 483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2019, 9:22 am by Jeff Wurzburg (US)
On March 27, United States District Court for the District of Columbia Judge James Boasberg ruled that Department of Health & Human Services Secretary Azar’s approval of work and community engagement requirements in Arkansas and Kentucky were arbitrary and capricious, halting their implementation. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 2:11 pm by Quinta Jurecic
Flynn was scheduled to testify at the trial in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia before the Honorable Anthony J. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:13 am by Venkat Balasubramani
This ruling comes on the heels of the District of Columbia Circuit’s holding that state anti-SLAPP laws can’t be invoked in federal court. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 9:47 am
District of Columbia, which Judge Wilkinson criticizes for dragging the Court into another hot button political topic (gun control) without a clear constitutional mandate. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 1:59 pm by Toby Heytens and Martine Cicconi
Heytens is solicitor general and Martine Cicconi is deputy solicitor general of the Commonwealth of Virginia, which filed an amicus brief on behalf of 15 states and the District of Columbia in support of the respondent in Trump v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 1:17 pm by Eugene Volokh
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that Judge Frederick J. [read post]
17 May 2016, 10:43 am by Eugene Volokh
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that Wrenn wasn’t one of those cases.) [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 4:12 pm by Shea Denning
The United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in District of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 10:00 am by Unknown
Reports & journal articles:Brief of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees before the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the Case O.A., et al. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:23 am by Joy Waltemath
Additionally, genuine issues of fact existed as to whether the department’s conduct was sufficiently extreme and outrageous, so it was for the jury to resolve this issue (Amobi v District of Columbia Department of Corrections, June 27, 2014, Brown, J). [read post]