Search for: "J. Wuerth" Results 21 - 39 of 39
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2018, 10:56 am by Alan J. Borsuk
The section also includes “The Person on the Other Side of the Table,” the text of remarks from Michael J. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 11:16 pm
Wuerth, Sources of International Law in Domestic Law: Domestic Constitutional Structure and the Sources of International Law Cedric Ryngaert, Sources of International Law in Domestic Law: Relationship Between International and Municipal Law Sources [read post]
18 Aug 2018, 10:38 am by Mikhaila R. Fogel
On Friday, Wittes spoke with security clearance expert Moss for the Lawfare Podcast on the president decision and its possible implications:     On this week’s Middle East ticker, J. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 6:17 am by William Ford
Ingrid Wuerth later discussed what this case says about criminal prosecutions of foreign state-owned enterprises. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 11:24 am by Jordan Brunner
Two White House officials showed House Permanent Select Committee Chairman Devin Nunes intelligence reports indicating incidental collection of information about Trump associates, the New York Times writes. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:06 am
Osofsky (right), University of Minnesota, and Ingrid Wuerth, Vanderbilt University, both IntLawGrrls contributors; Midyear Meeting Host Committee members Robert Ahdieh of Emory University, Curtis A. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 9:59 am
As we have each year since our founding ((here, here, here, here, and here), IntLawGrrls is proud today to highlight women who will speak March 23-26 at the forthcoming annual meeting of the American Society of International Law. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:37 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Ingrid Wuerth, author of a terrific exposition of the meaning of the clause, concludes that “The best reading of the Continental Congress’s power over ‘captures’ was that it had a relatively narrow reach—not ex [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:01 am by Chimène Keitner
By now, most Lawfare readers will be aware of the issues before the Supreme Court in Jesner v. [read post]