Search for: "J.M. V. DEPT. OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES" Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
”[10]  In enacting the ICWA, Congress declared its policy to be the protection ofthe best interests of Indian children and to promote the stability and security of Indian tribes and families by the establishment of minimal Federal standards for the removal of Indian children from their families and the placement of such children in foster or adoptive homes which will reflect the unique values of Indian culture, and by providing for assistance… [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Patouhas v Patouhas, 2019 WL 2202430 (2d Dept.,2019) plaintiff commenced an action for a divorce on March 1, 2016, by service of a summons with notice upon the defendant. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am by Tana Fye
”[10]  In enacting the ICWA, Congress declared its policy to be the protection of the best interests of Indian children and to promote the stability and security of Indian tribes and families by the establishment of minimal Federal standards for the removal of Indian children from their families and the placement of such children in foster or adoptive homes which will reflect the unique values of Indian culture, and by providing for assistance… [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 10:20 am
" Term. of Parent-Child Rel. of D.M., K.M., and J.M., and Nancy Moore v. [read post]