Search for: "J.R., a child v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2018, 5:39 pm
The recent NY Court of Appeals (highest court in New York state) decision in the matter of S.L. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 11:39 pm
" Carpenter v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:32 am
In Raps v Zaparta, 2017 WL 74739 (SDNY, 2017) after the Court granted the petition of Robert Adrian Raps for the return of his child (“J.R. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
This principle, articulated by the state's highest court, the Court of Appeals, in the Alison D. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 9:58 am
(NFP) J.R. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 5:10 am
Recently, a Trial Court decision, J.R. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 10:11 am
Burwell (Indian Self Determination and Education Assistance Act, funding) * State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2014state.htmlIn re L.S., J.R., et al. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 9:48 am
(best interests of an Indian child)In re S.H.E., D.H.E., J.W.C., D.W.C., J.R., and M.W.C. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 8:32 am
J.R. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 8:32 am
J.R. [read post]
27 Feb 2010, 8:03 am
Because wife contended that husband was not the biological father of J.R., there was a dispute as to whether J.R. was a child of the marriage. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 2:31 pm
J.R., 442 U.S. 584, 603, 99 S. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 10:13 am
Jan. 28, 2020) (finding an award for fees and costs inappropriate where petitioner had physically abused respondent and their child); Asumadu v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 10:13 am
Jan. 28, 2020) (finding an award for fees and costs inappropriate where petitioner had physically abused respondent and their child); Asumadu v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 3:38 pm
J.R. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 1:31 pm
It is regulated and controlled by law based upon principles of public policy affecting the welfare of the people of the State.' Fearon v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 4:02 am
The same procedure can be found in this case: Richard v. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 7:33 am
Substantial Connections are Crucial The case of J.R. v E.M., 997 N.Y.S.2d 669, (Suffolk County S.Ct. 2014) gave the following analyses of the more current state of the law on choosing which state laws should be applied. [read post]
18 May 2021, 5:56 am
In Bishop v. [read post]
7 May 2011, 3:05 am
See ibid.; In re Guardianship of J.R., 174 N.J. [read post]
