Search for: "JACK V. SMITH"
Results 1 - 20
of 494
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 9:31 pm
Lucia v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:01 am
The future of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s prosecution of former president Donald Trump for the alleged 2020 election conspiracy depends on the Supreme Court’s decision on presidential immunity in three ways. [read post]
1 May 2024, 5:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:39 am
Smith could move forward with a trial. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:45 am
If the court were to embrace special counsel Jack Smith’s arguments, a president would have no immunity from criminal charges, even for official acts taken in his presidency. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm
" (That prosecutor's name is Jack Smith.) [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:59 pm
* Perhaps inspired by that non sequitur, later in the argument, Justice Kavanaugh seemed to think that flaws in an expired independent counsel law that is not the basis for Jack Smith's appointment warranted reading an extended excerpt from Justice Scalia's dissent in Morrison v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm
At 9:45 a.m., Special Counsel Jack Smith, who brought the indictment against Trump over the former president’s alleged role in conspiring to overturn the results of the 2020 election, enters the courtroom and joins his team. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
Trump was indicted in August 2023 on four counts, arising from Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigation into the Jan. 6, 2021, attacks on the U.S. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 11:53 am
This can be easily done by issuing a much narrower, and quite correct opinion that Jack Smith lacks defendant's standing in Trump v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:18 pm
The final brief from Special Counsel Jack L. [read post]
History Shows the Supreme Court Knows How to Move Quickly, as it Should With the Trump Immunity Case
22 Apr 2024, 5:50 am
The alleged actions by then-President Trump that led to Special Counsel Jack Smith’s August 2023 criminal indictment of Trump were unprecedented in American history. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:25 pm
Here, Special Counsel Jack Smith is an Emperor who wears no clothes.The post Special Counsel Jack Smith Lacks Standing to Defend the D.C. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 3:23 pm
In one case, State of Florida v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:31 am
And in 1982, in Nixon v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm
It could also affect the proceedings in the case brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith against former President Donald Trump in a federal court in Washington, D.C. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 12:46 pm
Last month, we filed an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:16 am
It is also at the center of two of the charges brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith against former President Donald Trump in Washington, D.C. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 5:06 am
Smith v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 11:09 am
Will we hear Alito or his ideological colleagues sounding like Trump's media posts -- asking about, say, "deranged Jack Smith" -- when the Court (finally) gets around to hearing the presidential immunity case later this month? [read post]
