Search for: "JACOBS v. WARD" Results 1 - 20 of 54
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2015, 5:59 am by Daily Record Staff
Ward (collectively, “Substitute Trustees”), appellees, against mortgagor Sabir A. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 7:52 am
The Kat brings news of the decision of the Court of Appeal (Sir Robin Jacob providing a judgment with which Ward and Patten LJJ agreed) in the latest round of the Schütz v Werit dispute ([2011] EWCA Civ 927) – this time on the interpretation of s68 PA 1977. [read post]
5 May 2014, 5:17 am by Amy Howe
Last week the Court issued its decision in Environmental Protection Agency v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 3:02 am
 Highlights include:Lambretta v Teddy Smith, where Etherton J in the High Court ruled that there was no design right or copyright in the colourways of a track topJacobson & Sons v Globe GB was a trade mark case relating to the flash on the side of Gola shoes - the registrations were held by Etherton J to be valid and infringedIn Cook Biotech Incorporated v Edwards Lifesciences AG, Etherton LJ in the Court of Appeal gave the leading judgment rejecting the… [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:59 am
On appeal, Lords Justice Jacob, Etherton and Ward were in unanimous agreement that that there was no real risk that the confidential information allegedly disclosed to Ms. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 11:07 pm
In "Two Years of Patent Office Opinions," Nicholas Braddon, in IP Law and Strategies on January 24, 2008 takes a brief look at the basics of the UK Patent Office launched its Opinions service before analysing certain aspects of its performance to-date and some of the opportunities that it may provide.Thanks to Hal Wegner for also pointing out that in in Glaxo Group Ltd v Genentech Inc, [2008] EWCA Civ 23 (Ct. of Appeal 2008)(Ward, Mummery, Jacob, JJ.), the Court… [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 5:43 am
 The Court of Appeal (Sir Robin Jacob delivering judgment on behalf of himself and Lords Justices Ward and Patten) disagreed: the patented product should be considered as a whole, of which the cage and the bottle were each parts. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 12:45 pm
At the Court of Appeal, Ward LJ disagreed. [read post]