Search for: "JAHNKE V. JAHNKE" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2007, 6:53 am
The brief is available on the Reporters Committee Web site.The case is Forum Communications v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 5:25 am
Jahnke, please click on the following link: [www.nycourts.gov] For a copy of the Appellate Division's decision in Arbanil v. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 1:50 pm
An action for damages resulting from a dog bite may only be compensated under a theory of strict liability and not for common law negligence as demonstrated in Petrone v Fernandez, 12 NY3d 546, 550; Bard v Jahnke, 6 NY3d 592, 599; Collier v Zambito, 1 NY3d 444, 446-448. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 2:29 am by gmlevine
“Prior UDRP panels have expressed skepticism that a supplemental trademark confers rights to the owner until it is converted into a principal registration,” citing Jahnke & Sons Construction, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:52 pm
First issue at hand: The victim concedes that the Court of Appeals recently has set the standard of proof of liability in injuries by domestic animals to proceed under strict liability based on the owner’s knowledge of the animal’s vicious propensities, “not on theories of common-law negligence” (Bard v Jahnke, 6 NY3d 592, 599 [2006], citing Collier v Zambito, 1 NY3d 444.) [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:17 pm
The victim’s parents maintain that if you teach the dog to play or act in a way that puts others at risk of harm then according to Bard v Jahnke, 6 NY3d at 597 you can assume that the dog will have vicious propensities. [read post]