Search for: "JANSSEN ORTHO, LLC v. US "
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2020, 12:33 pm
Janseen Ortho LLC v. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:12 pm
Janssen Ortho LLC v. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 8:11 am
(patent infringement) 9/4: Purdue Pharma Products LP, Napp Pharmaceutical Group Ltd., Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 1:26 pm
The settlement arose from two whistleblower cases filed under federal and state False Claims Acts, alleging that Otho-McNeil Pharmaceutical LLC and Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., improperly marketed Topamax for psychiatric uses, when it was only FDA-approved to treat epilepsy. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 1:26 pm
The settlement arose from two whistleblower cases filed under federal and state False Claims Acts, alleging that Otho-McNeil Pharmaceutical LLC and Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., improperly marketed Topamax for psychiatric uses, when it was only FDA-approved to treat epilepsy. [read post]
25 May 2010, 7:54 am
Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical LLC, 10-CR-10147, US District Court, District of Massachusetts (Boston). [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 12:15 am
Navinta LLC (Property, intangible) Pulmicort Respules (Budesonide) – US: Liability for future indirect infringement: AstraZeneca LP v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 4:47 pm
Xenotech, LLC et al. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 5:13 pm
Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., No. 2-10-cv-00836 (E.D. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 9:40 am
Cir. 2019); Bayer Healthcare LLC v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 11:31 am
Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, 2013 WL 2917651, at *28 (Pa. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., ___ F.3d ___, 2015 WL 8538119 (6th Cir. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 4:30 am
Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
