Search for: "JAY v. State" Results 221 - 240 of 1,565
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2021, 10:44 pm by Josh Blackman
First, Roberts wrote a solo dissent in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:15 am by John Jascob
Lastly, the court justified its decision from a California Court of Appeals holding in the 1983 Hall v. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
The decision of Mr Justice Jay in Soriano v Forensic News LLC  [2021] EWHC 56 (QB) is interesting in a number of respects but in particular for its analysis of the circumstances in which the GDPR will apply to a publisher (or indeed any data controller/processor) based outside of the EU. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
United States The Supreme Court of the State of New York’s Second Department has overturned a decades-old precedent when it ruled that a false claim of homosexuality is no longer defamation per se. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am by INFORRM
Soriano v Forensic News LLC, heard 14 and 15 December 2020 (Jay J). [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 2:00 pm by Peter Margulies
However, Scalia also acknowledged the importance of context, stating in Whitman v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 1:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
(Please note that these filing figures represent federal court filings only; the figures do not include separate state court class action lawsuit filings.) [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
Ominously, in his recent judgment in Napag Trading Ltd & Ors v GEDI Gruppo Editoriale S.p.A & Anor [2020] EWHC 3034 (QB) Jay J noted: “Only the Second Defendant saw fit to raise a forum non conveniens challenge in advance of 1 January 2021 and the relevant EU regulation no longer applying… I refuse this application without prejudice to the Second Defendant’s ability to restore it at an appropriate time should the need arise. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
Soriano v Forensic News LLC, heard 14 and 15 December 2020 (Jay J). [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 28060-20 Sturt v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 27845-20 Garrity v The Scotsman, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 27809-20 Levick v The National, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 15320-20 Cook v Daily Express, 1 Accuracy (2019), 12 Discrimination (2019), No breach – after investigation 12005-20 Oliver… [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 4:38 pm
Contents include:Special Feature: Asian State Practice in International Law from the Perspective of Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL) Amritha V. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 5:32 am by James Romoser
Our preview of Trump v. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 29737-20 Imperial College London v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 27808-20 Ross v Bishop’s Stortford Independent, 1 Accuracy (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation Judgments The judgment of Jay J in Napag Trading Ltd & Ors v Gedi Gruppo Editoriale SPA & Anor [2020] EWHC 3034 (QB) is now available on Bailii. [read post]