Search for: "JENKINS v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION " Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2015, 5:25 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
The ARB dismissed the petition, noting that the ALJ’s decision would be the final decision of the Department in the matter. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The Trails Act – and especially the Justice Department’s litigation strategy responding to these landowners’ claims – is extravagantly expensive to taxpayers.  Below is a list and brief description of all these Trails Act cases which the Justice Department has lost this past year: Jenkins v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Missouri Dep't of Corr., No. 07-1598 In an action raising a retaliation claim under Title VII against plaintiff's employer, a state correctional department, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where, for purposes of a prima facie retaliation case: 1) a single comment at issue in the case was insufficient as a matter of law to support an objectively reasonable belief it amounted to unlawful sexual harassment; and 2) under the facts of the case, no reasonable person coul [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 3:45 pm
Diaz, No. 08-1575 A sentence pursuant to a guilty plea to knowingly possessing methamphetamine with intent to distribute is affirmed where, because the decision to depart by levels is discretionary, the district court's decision to select the higher of two levels that encompassed the mandatory minimum sentence was procedural error.. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
Jenkins drove away after dropping Hernandez off at the police department. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:20 am
U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, January 23, 2008 Jenkins v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 4:17 am
Weinberger, 475 U.S. 503 (1986) (Jewish Air Force psychologist who objected to a no-headgear rule); Jenkins v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Herrera Velutini and Rossini allegedly paid more than $300,000 to consultants who supported Vázquez Garced’s campaign. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm by Aaron
Miles with the Securities Division of the Department of Financial Institutions was suppressible. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 6:00 am by Administrator
Although the court in R v Jenkins upheld the constitutionality of conducting an ex parte trial when there is a risk of incarceration, the circumstances were quite different than those in Banks. [read post]