Search for: "JJS" Results 141 - 160 of 1,811
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2022, 11:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  A portrait of a meeting with JJ Chan. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 6:20 pm by Mark Summerfield
  The diminished bench split 3:3, with Kiefel CJ, Gageler and Keane JJ finding Aristocrat’s claims unpatentable, while Gordon, Edelman and Steward JJ would have allowed the appeal, concluding that the claimed invention was patent-eligible. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 6:05 am by INFORRM
Notably, two judges disagreed with the majority view (Gageler and Gleeson JJ), and found that the legislation was invalid. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 5:05 pm
JJ Abrams, George MacKay, Andrew Rowlands, Pippa Harris are just some of the individuals who have inspired me to think like that. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 12:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
No. 4J, 301 Or. 358 (1986), appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question, 480 U.S. 942 (1987) (over the dissenting votes of Brennan, Marshall, & O'Connor, JJ.); United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Wrestling with Religious Diversity, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
Below is an index of the posts on L&RUK concerning abortion which we have covered since 2012. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm by INFORRM
And, in Dunnes Stores v Ryan [2002] IEHC 61 (5 June 2002), Kearns J in the High Court struck down section 19(6) of the Companies Act, 1990 (also here), which required a company to provide an explanation or make a statement to an officer making inquiries about the company, on the grounds, inter alia, that it infringed the right to silence implied into Article 40.6.1(i) (a right now being relocated to Article 38.1 of the Constitution insofar as it relates to the… [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 10:44 pm by Josh Blackman
See Dobbs (BREYER, SOTOMAYOR, and KAGAN, JJ., dissenting) (explaining that the Framers "defined rights in general terms to permit future evolution in their scope and meaning"); New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. [read post]