Search for: "JOHN DOE(S) A-Z" Results 21 - 40 of 243
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2014, 6:23 am
Although Chauncey’s contribution would obviously be less than that of Jay Z, UK law does not require that the individual contributions of the joint authors be equal in terms of quality, quantity or originality.Whatever the 1988 Act states, its provisions, and hence any claim to authorship based on them, can be overridden by any contractual agreement to the contrary. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 8:47 pm by Race to the Bottom
The June 2021 complaint alleges that Dash is attempting to auction off the rights to Jay-Zs debut album, Reasonable Doubt, as an NFT, but Jay-Zs record company argues that Dash holds no ownership interest in the album’s copyright and therefore, Dash cannot sell it. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
Does he sleep in one room and you sleep in another room? [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 2:39 pm by David Cheifetz
When the Supreme Court of Canada says “X” in 2007, and repeats “X” in 2011 adding explicitly that “X does not mean Y but means Z”, it is reasonable to assume (is it not?) [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 4:55 am
In re Boucher (2009), supra.Where does that leave Boucher? [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 2:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
For those of you found this law review article interesting, in the course of discussions with colleagues about it, I came across this slightly older law review article analyzing Jay-Zs song, ‘99 Problems’. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 3:24 am
Yet this was too much for the prosecutor, who asked the judge to strike Juror Z.In a compelling dissent, Justice John Paul Stevens suggested that the court has misunderstood Juror Z's testimony and the relevant law. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 8:17 am
And then she and Jay-Z went to Cuba, and, when criticized, Jay-Z put out a pissy rap tune that (I think) insulted Obama. 6. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 6:00 am
Matter of Z-Z-O-, 26 I&N Dec. 586 (BIA 2015); The Board held that an Immigration Judge’s determination of future events in the context of an asylum case, is a finding of fact and subject to a clearly erroneous standard of review. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 1:27 am
We'll essentially assume the facts in the Boucher case: John Doe arrives at the O-Hare airport on a flight from London; as he goes through Customs, he's flagged for secondary (more intensive) screening. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 12:45 pm
The majority was composed of Kennedy, Chief Justice John G. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 8:23 am by Michael Lumer
John and Jane Does, the Second Circuit next addressed the case of Matthews v. [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 8:23 am by Michael Lumer
John and Jane Does, the Second Circuit next addressed the case of Matthews v. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 9:03 am
What is the Rule of Recognition (and Does it Exist)? [read post]