Search for: "JOHN DOE, Unknown Defendants"
Results 41 - 60
of 572
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2020, 5:21 am
Does: In this action against unnamed and unknown defendants, John Does 1–11 …, Richard Roe … moves to proceed under a pseudonym or, in the alternative, to seal the case. [read post]
4 May 2011, 12:15 pm
JOHN/JANE DOE EMPLOYEE, ET AL., DEFENDANT CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-25-DLB-JGW UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY, NORTHERN DIVISION2011 U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 3:57 pm
But sometimes it is necessary to file suits against “John Doe” defendants. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:36 pm
Often, when a defendant is unknown, a suit will be brought in the name of Jane or John Doe, and only after discovery will the actual parties be named. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 10:05 am
The defendant sued under OCGA § 33-7-11 (d) (1) of that statute, which states that a John Doe defendant’s home will be presumed to be the county where an injury-producing accident happens or the plaintiff’s home county. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 7:50 pm
Another porn company has filed a copyright lawsuit against hundreds of anonymous John Doe defendants who allegedly used the Bittorrent protocol to trade plaintiffs’ copyrighted movies. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 3:20 pm
Nonetheless, in the civil case the plaintiff filed an amended complaint identifying “John Doe” as the personal representative of Todd’s estate and substituting “John Doe” for Todd as the party defendant. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 11:01 pm
After the unknown infringer’s domain name registrar (the case does not say whether it was also the web host) refused to take down the allegedly infringing content, plaintiff filed suit against the “John Doe” defendant. [read post]
21 May 2018, 12:12 pm
Jurors found defendant 3 percent negligent, while apportioning 97 percent of fault to the John Doe defendant, awarding plaintiff $108,000 in damages. [read post]
21 May 2018, 12:12 pm
Jurors found defendant 3 percent negligent, while apportioning 97 percent of fault to the John Doe defendant, awarding plaintiff $108,000 in damages. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 8:11 pm
” Microsoft further alleged that “Defendants’ Websites contain numerous advertisements and/or hyperlinks to a variety of products and services” that enable the John Doe defendants to profit from their infringement. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:15 am
In this case out of Bibb County, Georgia, the plaintiffs, S.M. and C.H., brought claims against E.C. and another unknown defendant, John Doe, for injuries resulting from a highway car accident in Georgia. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 3:53 pm
John Does 1-5, United States District Court, Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, Civil Action File No. 1:17-cv-03843-CAP. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 3:53 pm
John Does 1-5, United States District Court, Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, Civil Action File No. 1:17-cv-03843-CAP. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:04 pm
Idaho October 20, 2008) Plaintiffs filed a defamation lawsuit against some known defendants as well as some anonymous John Doe defendants in federal court over statements posted to Complaintsboard.com. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 8:13 pm
The defendants’ Web site describes Cece’s Bargain Boutique as a seller of “replica” merchandise (partial screen shot below).The John Doe defendants are described as persons who reside or conduct business in this judicial district who are either “directly and personally contributing, inducing and engaging in the sale of counterfeit products” or are “directly engaging in the sale of… [read post]
30 May 2014, 3:23 pm
MIKE SMITH, JOHN DOES 1-100, JANE DOES 1-100, XYZ COMPANY, Defendants. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 6:13 am
Huntington Health and Rehabilitation Administrator, Annica Stansberry, and John Does 1 through 10 were also named in the suit. [read post]
3 May 2012, 9:39 am
" Thus, the judge recommended that the complaints be dismissed to all defendants other than John Doe I. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
John Doe and Jane Doe, 2014 FC 161, provides insight into the collision of Norwich Orders, means used to identify unknown infringers, and the growing business model of copyright trolls giving rise for the Courts to be more mindful of playing a role in potentially abusive behaviour of the trolls. [read post]
