Search for: "JOHN DOE CORPORATION v. PUBLIC COMPANY ACCOUNTING OVERSIGHT BOARD" Results 1 - 20 of 67
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2024, 7:28 am by Unknown
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, March 27, 2024).Claims for relief. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Of course, public firms are subject to more formal reporting, oversight, public scrutiny, and specific diversity mandates which may lead us to expect this diversity gap. [read post]
21 May 2021, 5:54 am
Cybersecurity Oversight and Defense — A Board and Management Imperative Posted by John F. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm by Kevin LaCroix
John Reed Stark is President of John Reed Stark Consulting LLC, a data breach response and digital compliance firm. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:07 am by John Jascob
Few pieces of wide-ranging legislation come together so quickly as did the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, but when Congress senses a felt need, it can move with surprising speed.The SEC Historical Society today presented a panel titled The Sarbanes-Oxley Act at 20: A Corporate Governance Legacy featuring many of the key players at the SEC who implemented the Congressional mandate on corporate governance meant to reassure investors that public company financial statements… [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 7:04 am
McIntosh, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Monday, February 6, 2023 Tags: Corporate governance, CSRD, Elon Musk, ESG, Esg governance, Wachtell Lipton Corporate Officers, Not Just Directors, Can Be Liable for Duty of Oversight Violations Posted by Jonathan Youngwood, Nicholas Goldin, and Stephen Blake, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Tags: Caremark, Delaware Court of Chancery, Derivative suits, Duty of oversight, ESG,… [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 7:04 am
McIntosh, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Monday, February 6, 2023 Tags: Corporate governance, CSRD, Elon Musk, ESG, Esg governance, Wachtell Lipton Corporate Officers, Not Just Directors, Can Be Liable for Duty of Oversight Violations Posted by Jonathan Youngwood, Nicholas Goldin, and Stephen Blake, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, on Tuesday, February 7, 2023 Tags: Caremark, Delaware Court of Chancery, Derivative suits, Duty of oversight, ESG,… [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
While Custodia is subject to state prudential regulation, it is not FDIC-insured or subject to federal prudential regulation and does not have a holding company subject to Federal Reserve oversight. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 11:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
  As discussed in John Reed Stark’s thoughtful guest post on this site (here), the third-party vendor aspect of the Capital One data breach has important implications for corporate boards’ cybersecurity oversight responsibilities. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Director Levenson was the consummate public servant who left an enduring mark on the Division of Corporation Finance, and the Commission more generally. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 12:34 pm by James Hamilton
The Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act exempts emerging growth companies from any rules promulgated by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) that would require mandatory audit firm rotation, thereby allowing them to avoid the unnecessary costs of changing from an outside auditor familiar with the company to one that is not. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 2:41 pm
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (08-861), it sounded as if the Court would never get beyond the specifics of the way that Board does it work - and is (or is not) supervised - under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act creating that new agency to monitor the auditing of corporate finance. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 6:24 am by Edith Garwood
Any actor considering a relationship with Caterpillar – or any corporation or company whose services or products have played a role in violations of human rights – should ask that company to demonstrate its commitment to human rights and to ensure that it does not contribute to or benefit from human rights violations. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 6:24 am by Edith Garwood
Any actor considering a relationship with Caterpillar – or any corporation or company whose services or products have played a role in violations of human rights – should ask that company to demonstrate its commitment to human rights and to ensure that it does not contribute to or benefit from human rights violations. [read post]