Search for: "JOHN DOE CORPORATIONS A THROUGH J" Results 21 - 40 of 579
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2018, 4:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, David Fontaine, CEO of Kroll, Inc. and its parent, Corporate Risk Holdings, and John Reed Stark, President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, take a look at the SEC’s guidance, with a particular focus on what the agency’s statement has to say about the duties of corporate directors. [read post]
12 May 2018, 9:11 am
Panel I From Moral Agency to Legal Rules 9.30-10.40am Chair: Evan J, Criddle Cabell Research Professor of Law, William & Mary College Panellists: John Linarelli Professor of Commercial Law, Durham University “Tribes, Corporations and International Law,” from the book, The Misery of International Law. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 8:22 pm by Larry Catá Backer
It does, on the other hand, provide a new reference point for civil society actors and the general stakeholders to use in light of corporate abuses. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:56 pm by Jon Gelman
”In addition to imposing substantial monetary sanctions, the resolution will subject J&J to stringent requirements under a Corporate Integrity Agreement (CIA) with the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG). [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Woodworth v Janes, 2 Johns Cas 417, 423 [NY 1801] [parties in equal fault have no rights in equity]; Sebring v Rathbun, 1 Johns Cas 331, 332 [NY 1800] [where both parties are equally culpable, courts will not "interpose in favor of either"]). [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Woodworth v Janes, 2 Johns Cas 417, 423 [NY 1801] [parties in equal fault have no rights in equity]; Sebring v Rathbun, 1 Johns Cas 331, 332 [NY 1800] [where both parties are equally culpable, courts will not "interpose in favor of either"]). [read post]