Search for: "JOHN DOE V DEPT OF CORRECTIONS" Results 1 - 20 of 76
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2019, 6:20 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
That brings us to the pitfalls of naming John Doe defendants as placeholders until the plaintiff can figure out who the real defendant is.The case is Ceara v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 2:09 am
If a ruling in an obscure tax case yesterday is any indication, the threshold for unacceptable chaos is surprisingly low.In Dept. of Revenue of Kentucky v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 1:08 am
Dept. of Corrections).......................................15Trial Tr., Timberlake v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:51 am
Please direct corrections, comments, questions, subscription requests and inquiries to Mr. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 2:25 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIntellectual Property 'First Sale' Doctrine Does Not Protect Foreign-Made Books From Copyright Act §602(a)(1) Import Bar John Wiley & Sons Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Please direct corrections, comments, questions, subscription requests and inquiries to Mr. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
Porter Co Sheriff's Dept., Seventh Circuit: Appellant brought a §1983 complaint based on a pretrial denial of medical care for a bullet wound to his abdomen. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendant concedes that a violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct (22 NYCRR 1200.0) does not, without more, support a malpractice claim (see Cohen v Kachroo, 115 AD3d 512, 513 [1st Dept 2014] [citations omitted]). [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Tennessee Dept. of Transp., No. 07-6491 (6th Cir. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 5:42 pm
Indiana Dept. of Correction, et al., a 7-page opinion, Sr. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
"When faced with a FOIL request, an agency must either disclose the record sought, deny the request and claim a specific exemption to disclosure, or certify that it does not possess the requested document and that it could not be located after a diligent search (see Public Officers Law § 87 [2]; § 89 [3]; Corvetti v Town of Lake Pleasant, 239 AD2d 841, 843 [3d Dept 1997])" (Beechwood Restorative Care Ctr., 5 NY3d at 440-441). [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 6:07 pm
(NFP) - "While the Masons are correct that the statute makes the bond mandatory, the law does not redress trifles. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Judicial Screening Committee, 18 AD3d 1100, 1101 [3d Dept 2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 711 [2005]).At the outset, this Court notes that the advisory opinions of the Committee on Open Government (which were inconsistent here and upon which both sides thus rely to various extents) are "neither binding upon the agency nor entitled to greater deference in an article 78 proceeding than is the construction of the agency" itself (Matter of John P. v Whalen, 54 NY2d 89, 96… [read post]