Search for: "JOHN DOES 1 -10"
Results 81 - 100
of 9,044
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2019, 11:34 am
By Bruce Zagaris On May 1, 2019, the U.S. [read post]
12 May 2014, 11:24 am
" It claims that "John Doe" has infringed 67 separate copyrighted works owned by Malibu Media. [read post]
7 May 2012, 11:59 am
Does 1–3757, 2011 U.S. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 9:02 pm
John Doe, in this context, does not refer to a person; it is a legal proceeding. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 8:57 pm
Doe's attorney, Earl McCoy of Lafayette, questioned the logic of the law, which took effect July 1, 2006. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 9:29 am
John Does 1-5United States District Court for N.D. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 4:56 am
Does 1-9, 2008 U.S. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 7:20 am
Does 1-14. 2 of the defendants had settled with the RIAA. [read post]
21 Aug 2021, 5:40 am
Fictitious Names In An Illinois Divorce Illinois law allows any litigant to request to use a pseudonym like John Doe or Jane Doe. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 1:01 pm
Does 1-27, where a group of 8 students are represented by the MittelAsen law firm, and 2 other students are represented by student attorneys from the University's Legal Aid Clinic, oral argument was held on Friday, according to a report from the Bangor Daily News.Student attorney Jason Rayne, a law student at the University of Maine, working with the Cumberland Legal Aid Clinic, argued the motions on behalf of the students represented by his clinic. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 5:16 pm
Does 1-1017, No. 11-2068, 2011 WL 8179128 (C.D.Ill. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:50 am
John Doe is the first lawsuit of this type filed in Indiana). [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 6:14 pm
Does 1-5, a John Doe case targeting students at Northern Michigan University, the motion by pro se litigant John Doe #5 to quash the subpoena has been denied by the Magistrate Judge.Opinion and order of Magistrate Judge denying John Doe #5's motion to quash*-->* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation-->Commentary & discussion:[]-->--> -->-->Keywords:… [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:26 pm
Does 1-1058, the appeals court overruled the district court's grant of ex parte discovery, ruling that mass John Doe cases could not be brought where there was no known basis for the assertion of personal jurisdiction over the unknown defendants, and on alternative grounds that there could be no joinder merely because defendants allegedly downloaded the same file through BitTorrent and therefore possibly in the same "swarm". [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 9:50 am
The defendant-appellant, John Doe No.1, anonymously posted allegedly defamatory statements about the plaintiff-appellee, Cahill, on an internet blog. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 11:25 am
John Does 1-6, one of the defendants has moved for summary judgment or dismissal of the complaint. [read post]
24 Dec 2012, 11:21 am
John Does 1-6, the Court has denied a defendant's motion to sever and quash.Order denying motion to sever and quash, December 24, 2012, Hon. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 10:20 am
John Does 1-34, Judge McMahon has issued a decision in which she severed and dismissed the claims against John Does 2 through 34.June 18, 2012, Decision of Hon. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 2:10 pm
Does 1-27, a case targeting University of Maine students, the "John Does" represented by Portland's Mittel Asen law firm have filed their reply memoranda in support of their motions to strike the Carlos Linares declaration, and to vacate the ex parte discovery order and quash the subpoena issued pursuant to that order, responding to the RIAA's opposition papersReply memo in support of motion to vacate and quash*Reply memo in support of motion… [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 5:13 am
The student is identified as John Doe #1. [read post]
