Search for: "JOHN DOES 1-3"
Results 21 - 40
of 7,951
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2013, 6:16 am
Table of Contents Section 1: Use of Fictitious Names or Pseudonyms in Connecticut Courts Table 1: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Civil Matters Table 2: John or Jane Doe Defendants in Summary Process Matters Section 2: Use of Fictitious Business Names in Connecticut Table 3: Use of Fictitious Business Names Section 3: Criminal Impersonation in Connecticut Published: 6/6/2013 9:20 AM [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 6:45 am
Does 1-16, the case targeting students at the State University of New York in Albany, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has granted an interim stay of the subpoena calling for the identity of student "John Doe #3". [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 10:56 am
Does 1-19, the District of Columbia case, being handled by Matthew Oppenheim personally, which targets students at George Washington University, the Court -- after reading the motion to quash filed by John Doe #3 -- has on its own initiative issued an Order to Show Cause ordering the plaintiffs to show cause, on or before November 29th:-why the defendant's motion should not be granted; and-why the Court's ruling should not be applicable to all… [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 7:54 am
Thus, the more time passes in John Doe’s case without (1) knowing who he is; (2) providing him with access to counsel; or (3) allowing the courts to even review the legality of his detention, the more alarmed I am by the government’s conduct—and the more alarmed you (and Ben) should be, too. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 7:46 am
Does 1-16, a case against students at the State University of New York in Albany, John Doe #3 has moved to extend the stay previously granted by the US Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit.Defendant's motion to extend stay*-->* Document published online at Internet Law & Regulation-->Commentary & discussion:[]-->--> -->-->Keywords: lawyer digital copyright law online internet law legal… [read post]
19 May 2014, 1:43 pm
" It claims that "John Doe" has infringed 43 separate copyrighted works owned by Malibu Media. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 4:02 am
Does 1-17, the case targeting George Washington University, defendant John Doe #3 has filed his response to the RIAA's response to the Order to Show Cause issued by Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly.Response to RIAA response** Document published online at Internet Law & RegulationCommentary & discussion:[]-->Slashdot this story! [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 8:23 am
The now searchable list of defendants in an infringement action brought by Burberry (SDNY 1:12-cv-00479-TPG) (complaint not on ECF) John Doe 1 QIAO RENFENG A/KA QIU YANYANG AIKIA LIN RUI A/K/A CHEN DERONG A/K/ A XUE BINXUAN A/K/A YONGBO LI A/KIA XIAO JINGJING A/KIA JIANG AI A/KIA XUZHEYE XUZHEYE A/KIA XU ZHEYE A/KIA ZHOUMINMIN AIKIA ZHAO LI AIKIA ZHENG LINTIAN A/K/A LINTIAN ZHENG AIKIA John Doe 2 A/K/A LIUQING WU A/K/A WU LIUQI G… [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 2:10 pm
" Leonard, slip op. at 2-3. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 3:55 pm
Does 1-37, 2011 WL 1431619 (N.D. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 7:38 am
We previously sketched an outline of the typical recording industry lawsuit: "(1) the mass lawsuit against a large number of 'John Does'; (2) the "ex parte" order of discovery; and (3) the subpoenas demanding the names and addresses of the 'John Does'. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 2:30 pm
By John R. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 7:05 pm
Perriguey of Law Works LLC Defendant: William Michael Jones, Mindy Jones, www.boneprone.com, www.tubekings.com, www.socalmovies.com, La Vista, Chin Holdings China, Marvin Greencarrier, John Does 1 – 100, John Doe Companies 1-100 Cause: Copyright Infringement, Contributory Copyright Infringement, Vicarious Copyright Infringement, Inducement of Copyright Infringement, False Designation of Origin… [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 3:13 pm
John Doe, 2016 WL 6958647 (9thCir. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 2:03 pm
Does 1-16, the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has affirmed the orders of the lower court denying a motion to quash.The appeals court held that the order was appealable, but rejected John Doe #3's arguments that :-the district court was without authority to refer the motion to the Magistrate Judge;-the complaint failed to state a claim for copyright infringement; -the "fair use" defense barred plaintiffs' case; and-the… [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 10:41 pm
1. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:48 pm
Also, this lawsuit raises many more issues than did #1 and #2.1-6-2010 Nebraska:Bob Lindemeier filed a complaint in Lincoln County District Court seeking a permanent injunction barring enforcement of Nebraska's new sex offender registry laws.The lawsuit, filed on behalf of "John Doe" on Jan. 4, was granted an ex-parte order by Judge John Murphy. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 11:29 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 11:29 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 11:25 am
Does 1-38, the judge dismissed the case as to all John Does except Doe Number 2, due to the fact that there was no basis for joining the different John Does in a single lawsuit.As it turns out, according to a report from Technician Online, "John Doe #2" doesn't actually exist:Students win first battle with RIAAJudge rules in favor of the students' motion to quash a set of lawsuits dished out by the… [read post]
