Search for: "JOHNSON V. COMPREHENSIVE" Results 1 - 20 of 388
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2003, 11:00 pm
In its recent decision of Johnson Controls, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2003, 11:00 pm
In its recent decision of Johnson Controls, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 2:53 pm by anbrandon
Much has changed since the Supreme Court issued its Johnson decision in June 2015, but one thing remains the same: we still have no comprehensive understanding of how the decision applies, and the law surrounding the Armed Career Criminal Act remains as murky as ever. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 10:56 am
  Regardless of whether you agree with it -- and it involves a controversial issue -- it's incredibly coherent, comprehensive and tight. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Health Plan Excess Fee Case Filed Against Johnson and Johnson In Lewandowski v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 2:21 pm by Justin Walsh
Justice Jim Johnson poo-poos science: Date: July 22, 2010 Contact: Brendan Williams, (360) 791-3979 In 2005’s Ferry County v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 7:00 am
On August 28, 2007, a three judge panel (McKay, Briscoe, Kelly) of the Tenth Circuit decided Johnson v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 7:07 am by Charles Johnson
Federal Drug Crimes Overview The Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970, also known as the Controlled Substances Act, classifies narcotics, marijuana and other drugs into five categories, or Schedules. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 4:27 am
Negotiating job security provisions in the course of collective bargaining Matter of Johnson City Professional Firefighters Local 921 (Village of Johnson City), 2011 NY Slip Op 08226, Court of Appeals The Village of Johnson City and Johnson City Professional Fire Fighters, Local 921 IAFF executed a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) containing a “no-layoff clause” that provided as follows:      “A. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 8:17 am by Annette Burns
   That misuse of the Hays findings is no longer the case, thanks to Johnson v. [read post]