Search for: "JOHNSON v. D" Results 1 - 20 of 2,771
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
First and foremost, the Johnson Ministry was dedicated to re-access the Lugano Convention[23] which extended the Brussels regime to certain Member States of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA)/European Economic Area (EEA) in its own right.[24] Given the strong resentments Brexiteers showed against the CJEU during their campaign this move is not without a certain irony, as its case law is also crucial to the uniform interpretation of the Lugano Convention.[25] Whereas Switzerland,… [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
This includes documents recently disclosed as a result of the settlement of Penebaker v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
Source: USPTO  Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:37 am by Chris Castle
These Phonorecords IV rates are in effect for five years, but the next negotiation for new rates is coming soon (called Phonorecords V or PR V for short). [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
The right mounted court challenges with mixed results for decades, until this June when the Supreme Court’s conservative supermajority ruled in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 11:16 am by Eugene Volokh
Johnson, 491 U.S. 397, 412 (1989) (holding that a law based on the communicative or emotive impact of speech on its audience is content based and subject to "the most exacting scrutiny" (quoting Boos v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 8:03 am by Eugene Volokh
From a Reply brief filed by plaintiff's counsel in Wojcik v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:52 am by Eugene Volokh
I thought I'd pass along this friend-of-the-court brief that I just filed a couple of days ago in the Ohio Court of Appeals (Doe v. [read post]