Search for: "JONES v. GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA" Results 21 - 40 of 222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2014, 6:24 am
 The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed Jones's conviction `because of admission of the evidence obtained by warrantless use of the GPS device. . . . [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 1:14 pm by Mike Scarcella
District Court for the District of Columbia, arguing the ban violates the First Amendment. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 9:14 am by Elizabeth Arce
  Although the warrant authorized the device’s installation on the undercarriage of the vehicle in Maryland within 10 days, the government installed the GPS on the 11th day and in the District of Columbia. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 2:58 am by SHG
The warrant required them to do so within 10 days and within the District of Columbia. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:13 am by Rachel Sachs
 Orin Kerr at the Volokh Conspiracy and David Kravets at WIRED have coverage of the Department of Justice’s brief on remand in Jones, before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 1:20 pm by Rebecca Jeschke
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that Mr. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 2:15 pm
If the Supreme Court upholds the decision of the Circuit Court for the District of Columbia, Maryland search and seizure law will change. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 12:16 pm by Ken Lammers
Facts: A search warrant was gotten in the District of Columbia in order to put a GPS tracker on a car. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 10:18 am by Jeff Neuburger
The magistrate also discussed the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that is now before the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 1:18 pm by Jeff Neuburger
The magistrate also discussed the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that is now before the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:05 am
Antoine Jones was convicted in the District of Columbia in 2008 on drug charges after police followed him for 28 days with a secretly installed GPS device that monitored his location. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:36 pm by Center for Internet and Society
The government tried hard to distinguish government direct collection of location as in Jones from third party collection from intermediaries and online providers. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 11:20 am by Andrew Tidwell-Neal
Jones and it involves the warrantless placing of GPS tracking devices on the cars of citizens by the police.The facts of the case are as follows: the police obtained a warrant to place a GPS tracking device on the car of the suspect, but the warrant required the police place the device within 10 days and that it be installed within the District of Columbia. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 9:38 am
District Court for the District of Maryland – the U.S. [read post]