Search for: "JONES v. MAJOR"
Results 121 - 140
of 2,013
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2023, 1:45 pm
Jones. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 1:33 pm
In Jones v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 7:09 pm
Even though the Supreme Court has already agreed to decide in Jones v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 12:18 pm
In Fraser v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:14 am
Held: by a majority (Lord Hope and Lady Hale dissenting), allowing the appeal. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 11:23 am
Jones v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 7:56 am
Guidry v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 11:35 am
In the recent GPS decision of United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:59 am
(Orin Kerr) In its opinion below in what became United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 10:14 am
Judge Read wrote the majority opinion, in which Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo and Jones concurred. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:11 am
In this post, Henry Powell (Associate) and Antoni Hajdon (Of Counsel) in the Real Estate Disputes team at CMS, comment on the case of Barton & Ors v Morris & Anor in place of Gwyn Jones (deceased) [2023] UKSC 3 – handed down on 25 January 2023. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 8:01 am
The panel said our decision in Willingham v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:24 am
Jones. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 6:34 am
The US Supreme Court ruled Thursday in Jones v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:43 pm
Back in January, in the case of United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 6:45 am
In what they termed a case of first impression, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court issued a decison on December 21, 2011 in the case of Jones v. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 1:47 pm
Observing that since 2002, the riverboat where the employee worked had been moored and stationary — with the exception of rare tests conducted in compliance with federal regulations — that it was connected to the dock by eight mooring lines, two double-up lines, three fuel hoses, a sewage and water hose, and seven power cables, and that a majority of decisions on the issue had refused to grant vessel in navigation status to moored riverboats, an Indiana appellate court held that… [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 7:56 am
Guidry v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:14 pm
But if there is no majority view in Jones, I would think these puzzles may need to be addressed. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:43 am
The majority decision of five Justices turned on the physical placement of the tracking device on the vehicle. [read post]
