Search for: "JONES v. SUPERIOR COURT OF DELAWARE"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
We can't say much about these, because Dechert represents the defendants in Seroquel litigation, but here are two more decisions just handed down in Delaware Superior Court (Delaware courts are superior) granting summary judgments in Seroquel cases: Hopkins v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 11:30 am
In Jones v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 3:36 pm
On September 23, 2009, the Pennsylvania Superior Court handed down a monumental UIM decision in the case of Pusl v. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 3:03 am
I was first appointed to the Delaware Superior Court at the age of 43 as an Associate Judge and later as Resident Judge, where I served for 6 years. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 1:25 pm
I was first appointed to the Delaware Superior Court at the age of 43 as an Associate Judge and later as Resident Judge, where I served for 6 years. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 7:00 pm
Thus, the case was transferred to the Delaware Superior Court, the state's trial court of general jurisdiction. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 1:01 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Most cases are, by default, in the Superior Court. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 5:39 pm
Titan Auto Ins., Nationwide Ins, Jones, and Briel, March Term 2010, No. 03050 (Phila. [read post]
21 May 2010, 1:26 pm
The court relied upon and cited Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 11:53 am
The matter was heard by Superior Court Judge Frederick DeVesa. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Delaware v. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Delaware v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 7:51 am
“Money is accountability,” announced Stephen Shackelford, a lawyer for the voting machine company Dominion, moments after a Delaware superior court judge announced that the company had settled its lawsuit against Fox News. [read post]
22 May 2016, 6:06 pm
Interestingly, Westlaw includes the superior letter in Hood v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:56 am
(1) Despite the State’s repeated use of “moped” to describe the defendant’s vehicle, sufficient evidence existed to establish that the defendant’s vehicle met the statutory definition of “motor vehicle”; (2) New trial required where trial court plainly erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definition of “motor vehicle” State v. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 7:33 pm
To court provided this explanation on this recent motion, in Karasik v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 11:03 am
Jones v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
”Citing Harlow v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Jones, No. 07-2052 Sentence is affirmed where defendant pled guilty to charges stemming from her role in a bank fraud conspiracy. [read post]
