Search for: "JUDICIAL WATCH, INC" Results 161 - 180 of 887
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
For example, a woman claimed a pharmacy allowed her husband to watch CCTV footage of her buying a pregnancy test kit. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 11:39 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the November 8 and 15 conferences) The post Relist Watch appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 10:00 pm
And third, applicants have an alternative means of seeking judicial review through 35 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 12:06 pm by Cindy Cohn
The practice enables the government to hide misconduct and evade judicial review of its actions. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 12:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Once again, there are a multitude of things worth watching in the world of D&O. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 6:59 am
On August 6, a group of three individual plaintiffs represented by Judicial Watch, Inc. filed suit in Los Angeles County Superior Court against California’s Secretary of State seeking to block the provisions of SB 826, which was signed into law in September 2018 and provides that: By December 31, 2019, every publicly traded company on a major securities exchange (e.g. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 12:39 pm by Nassiri Law
Plaintiffs filed the lawsuit with assistance from Judicial Watch, Inc., which states it is conservative but not partisan and committed to education, transparency and accountability in government. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 12:05 pm by Vishnu Kannan
Watch the event live here. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
The hearing can be watched on the European Court of Human Right’s website. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 5:18 am by Paul Roberto Rodriguez Aviles
Several organizations watching the case say tens of thousands more veterans may join the MDL. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:59 am by Kevin Goldberg
I was one of many who traveled (in my case, on foot) to the United States Supreme Court on April 22, 2019 to watch oral arguments in the case of Food Marketing Institute, Inc. v. [read post]