Search for: "JUNES V. STATE" Results 41 - 60 of 28,022
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2018, 8:08 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
Here is the abstract: On June 22, 2018, the United States Supreme Court handed down its much-anticipated Fourth... [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:47 pm
UPDATED ON JUNE 26, 2013: In a landmark decision penned by Justice Kennedy, in which Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan joined (Justices Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito dissenting), the United States Supreme Court held that the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional as a violation of equal protection pursuant to the Fifth Amendment in the case United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:09 am by Marcia Oddi
The State has until Monday, June 27 to file a response brief to the petition for rehearing in Barnes v.... [read post]
3 Jun 2003, 9:10 am
On June 3, 1918, the US Supreme Court ruled in Hammer v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am by Blog Editorial
  First there is Houldsworth v Bridge Trustees Limited  and Secretary of State for Work and Pensions on Monday 20 and Tuesday 21 June 2011. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 6:00 am by Amanda Pickens Nitto
June 7, 2018) (purported class action removed from state to federal court alleging Charter Communications has failed to provide certain internet and cable services in violation of state law) Washington v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 1:14 pm by brian
UNITED STATES ( No. 09-6338 ) decided June 17, 2010. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 6:24 am by Unreported Opinions
STATE OF MARYLAND appeared first on Maryland Daily Record. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:05 am by Unreported Opinions
STATE OF MARYLAND appeared first on Maryland Daily Record. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 2:17 am
Control order curfew is reasonable Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:58 am by sally
Patel and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 741; [2012] WLR (D) 174 “The decision of the Secretary of State for the Home Department to refuse an extension of leave to remain in the United Kingdom was not invalidated by the fact that she had made no removal direction in respect of the applicant at the same time as or shortly after the refusal of the extension application.” WLR Daily, 1st June 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]