Search for: "Jack Doe"
Results 21 - 40
of 6,574
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2017, 10:13 pm
Even more so can that parent a child such as Jack who does not live with him. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 5:11 am
So too does the need for a rancher to have the appropriate caliber rifle and readily available skid loader. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 1:15 pm
The latest LGJ is a more in-depth look at the bill Jack Thompson was behind in Utah and some of its major flaws.Read on! [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 10:01 am
Subsequent to the Supreme Court’s holding in Jack Daniels, the Ninth Circuit vacated its original ruling and then, after additional briefing, held that the Rogers test does not apply to this case because AJ Press uses PUNCHBOWL to identify its news product. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:33 pm
I am looking forward to the upcoming conference at Yale Law School on Jack Balkin’s Living Originalism. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 2:15 pm
(And this is a personal and truthful reflection): why, then, does it come as such a shock when Jack Welch says it out loud? [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
ShareThursday’s decision in Jack Daniel’s Properties v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 8:38 pm
“Ruling: Dog chew toy does not infringe upon Jack Daniels copyright. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
On infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 3:32 pm
Supreme Court resolved the petition in Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:47 am
The toy replaces the text “Jack Daniel’s Old No. 7” with “Bad Spaniels The Old No. 2,” and generally mimics the black and white design of the label and the square shape of the bottle: Previous decisions in the case have held that the design is a clear parody and therefore does not infringe the Jack Daniel’s trademark and/or trade dress rights. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:47 am
The toy replaces the text “Jack Daniel’s Old No. 7” with “Bad Spaniels The Old No. 2,” and generally mimics the black and white design of the label and the square shape of the bottle: Previous decisions in the case have held that the design is a clear parody and therefore does not infringe the Jack Daniel’s trademark and/or trade dress rights. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 2:41 am
In view of the fact that things tend to hang around on the internet, buried in the search engines, for a long time, this is definitely a Bad Thing.So where does the public interest lie? [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 7:37 am
It does not happen often, but once in a blue moon, a lawyer is recognized for civility. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 7:37 am
It does not happen often, but once in a blue moon, a lawyer is recognized for civility. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 7:57 am
VIP’s argument, supported by the weight of numerous academic amici, does not directly engage with the contention by Jack Daniel’s that the First Amendment is not called into play by speech that is confusing. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 5:08 am
Does the "everybody does it" defense work here? [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 10:00 am
” The only wrinkle here is that Jack in the Box does not allege that FTX’s exchange is subpar or otherwise lacking in quality; Jack’s focus is on the Moon Man character itself. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:59 am
Circuit, which does not bind the Supreme Court, and in which the standing issue was never raised. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 6:36 pm
JACK GOLDSMITH: DOES EUROPE BELIEVE IN INTERNATIONAL LAW? [read post]
