Search for: "Jack Goldsmith, Benjamin Wittes"
Results 341 - 360
of 421
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2017, 10:54 am
Jack Goldsmith shared his thoughts on why Yates’ reasons for not enforcing Trump’s refugee ban were weak and unpersuasive. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 12:15 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Benjamin Wittes argued that while the bipartisan impeachment is an important and necessary step, there are many problems it does not solve. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 9:30 am
Two petitions had been filed seeking the Road Map, one by Benjamin Wittes, Jack Goldsmith, and me, with legal representation from Protect Democracy. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 11:33 am
Benjamin Wittes noted that Lawfare was cited in yesterday’s New York Times editorial on Comey’s announcement. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 10:47 am
Jack Goldsmith and Benjamin Wittes posted the latest Hoover Book Soiree: Edward Jay Epstein and “How America Lost Its Secrets. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 5:00 am
Protect Democracy also represents Lawfare contributors and editors Benjamin Wittes, Jack Goldsmith, Scott Anderson and Susan Hennessey on a number of separate matters.) [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 12:48 pm
Jack Goldsmith and Benjamin Wittes provided a helpful guide for those perplexed by the ongoing flap over FBI Director James Comey and the Clinton email investigation. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 1:57 pm
Bob Bauer and Jack Goldsmith analyzed two House bills to regulate abuse of the presidential pardon power. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 10:33 am
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Jack Goldsmith and Benjamin Wittes examined in detail the danger to presented by Trump to the “Grand Bargain” between the intelligence community and the American people. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 10:15 am
Jack Goldsmith and Oona Hathaway explained how the limited and informal system in place at the time of Snepp v. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 9:49 pm
Mass. 2006) Books Bruce Ackerman, The Failure of the Founding Fathers: Jefferson, Marshal and the Rise of Presidential Democracy (Belknap 2005) Jack Goldsmith & Tim Wu, Who Controls the Internet: Illusions of a Borderless World (Oxford 2006) Geoffrey Robertson, The Tyrannicide Brief: The Story of the Man Who Sent Charles I to the Scaffold (Pantheon 2006; Chatto & Windus 2005) Benjamin Wittes, Confirmation Wars: Preserving Independent Courts in Angry… [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 8:22 am
Jack Goldsmith concurred that a reelected Trump would mean that “his norm breaking will be seen to serve the presidency more than it does today. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm
Jack Goldsmith aske [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 11:16 am
Jack Goldsmith presented some of the many challenges of working for Donald Trump. [read post]
8 Sep 2018, 8:02 am
Sawyer, the steel seizure case, on this week’s National Security Law Podcast: Jack Goldsmith called on former intelligence community employees who have had bad experiences with their agencies’ prepublication processes to share these experiences with the Knight Institute and the American Civil Liberties Union. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 12:22 pm
The New York Times tells us that President Donald Trump signed a much-anticipated executive order rolling back most of former President Barack Obama’s legacy on climate change, celebrating the move as a way to promote energy independence. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
When Congress passed the 2011 NDAA, Jack Goldsmith evaluated President Obama’s options. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 9:41 am
” Similarly, Bob Bauer and Jack Goldsmith describe a post-Watergate “norm” “inhibit[ing] presidential involvement in ... pending investigations. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 8:21 am
Jack Goldsmith and John Manning have studied the “protean” nature of the clause and the many contradictory interpretations that courts have adopted; here, Mueller’s analysis has some resemblance to the understanding set out by Andrew Kent, Ethan Leib and Jed Shugerman, who argue that the Take Care Clause imposes a “duty of fidelity” on the president. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 5:06 am
As Jack Goldsmith explains, “[O]ur country has—through presidential aggrandizement accompanied by congressional authorization, delegation, and acquiescence—given one person, the president, a sprawling military and enormous discretion to use it in ways that can easily lead to a massive war. [read post]
