Search for: "Jack Goldsmith" Results 781 - 800 of 1,692
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2017, 9:11 am by Lawfare Editors
 Jack Goldsmith will interview Daniel Drezner on his new book, The Ideas Industry: How Pessimists, Partisans, and Plutocrats are Transforming the Marketplace of Ideas. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 4:50 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 It is not okay to have a president who—as Jack Goldsmith put it last night—”does not remotely understand his role, status, and duties as President and Chief Executive” and for whom “this failure infects or undermines just about everything he does. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 1:37 pm by Alex Potcovaru, Matthew Kahn
Ben gave his preliminary comments on the document and Jack Goldsmith also provided two reflections, partially, but not completely, agreeing with Ben. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 6:23 am by Robert Litt
 It’s not clear whether this reflects the apparent dysfunction in White House operations (Jack Goldsmith has written about his concerns about the effectiveness of the White House Counsel’s office) or a conscious tactical decision. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 5:30 am by Chris Mirasola
” Lawfare’s own Jack Goldsmith wrote this morning that, “Wray is smart, serious, and professional. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:56 pm by Lawfare Editors
On Thursday, June 15, Jack Goldsmith will interview Daniel Drezner on his new book, The Ideas Industry: How Pessimists, Partisans, and Plutocrats are Transforming the Marketplace of Ideas. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 11:52 am by Eugene Kontorovich
Finally, the tweets may actually bolster the government’s legal case (rather than purposefully undermine it, as Jack Goldsmith suggested). [read post]
3 Jun 2017, 4:17 am by Matthew Kahn
In counterterrorism news, Benjamin Wittes, Jack Goldsmith, Bobby Chesney, and Matthew Waxman analyzed the Flake-Kaine AUMF proposal for the war against the Islamic State. [read post]
31 May 2017, 1:08 pm by Quinta Jurecic
Bobby, Jack Goldsmith, Matt Waxman, and Benjamin Wittes discussed the new AUMF introduced by Senators Jeff Flake and Tim Kaine. [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:11 am by Lawfare Editors
The next in our series of book soirees at the Hoover Institution will take place from 5-7 pm on Thursday, June 15, when Jack Goldsmith will interview Daniel Drezner on his new book, The Ideas Industry: How Pessimists, Partisans, and Plutocrats are Transforming the Marketplace of Ideas. [read post]
30 May 2017, 8:30 am by Josh Blackman
This post is the third part of a four-part series on the Fourth Circuit’s recent en banc decision in IRAP v. [read post]
27 May 2017, 7:53 am by Quinta Jurecic
Jack Goldsmith pushed back on the White House’s suggestion that former FBI Director James Comey “grandstanded” and “politicized” the Russia investigation. [read post]
23 May 2017, 10:45 am by Russell Spivak
In an interesting examination of the role of social media platforms and terrorism, the U.S. [read post]
22 May 2017, 11:30 am by Matthew Kahn
Jack Goldsmith refuted the argument that former FBI Director James Comey grandstanded or politicized the Russia investigation. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:19 am by Quinta Jurecic
” Likewise, Jack Goldsmith has taken the case of Rosenstein as an occasion to consider how the usual difficulties of serving with integrity as a government lawyer and political appointee are magnified under this most peculiar of administrations. [read post]
20 May 2017, 5:23 am by Matthew Kahn
It was only Monday that Jack Goldsmith, Susan Hennessey, Quinta Jurecic, Benjamin Wittes, Matt Kahn, and Elishe Wittes posted initial thoughts on the Trump disclosure of shared foreign intelligence with the Russians in the Oval Office. [read post]
17 May 2017, 10:20 am by Matthew Kahn
Helen Murillo, Jack Goldsmith, Susan Hennessey, Quinta Jurecic, Matthew Kahn, Paul Rosenzweig, and Benjamin Wittes provided initial thoughts on President Trump’s request that Comey close the investigation into Michael Flynn. [read post]
16 May 2017, 12:25 pm by Matthew Kahn
  ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Jack Goldsmith highlighted a note in the Harvard Law Review on how the Supreme Court might rule on an upcoming case dealing with corporate liability under the Alien Tort Statute. [read post]