Search for: "Jack Smith" Results 21 - 40 of 2,183
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2024, 12:46 pm by Josh Blackman
Our brief argued that Special Counsel Jack Smith is not an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 6:15 pm by William A. Jacobson
" The post Florida Trump Prosecution: Jack Smith Throws Fit Over Possible Jury Instructions That May Sink His Case first appeared on Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 7:36 am by Howard Bashman
“The Consequences of Jack Smith’s Rush to Trial; Special Counsel Jack Smith’s rush to try Donald Trump violates Justice Department rules and presents tricky issues for the Supreme Court on the immunity issue”: Jack Goldsmith has this post at the “Lawfare” blog. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 4:00 pm by Mary Chastain
" The post Jack Smith Wants Judge to Exclude Trump’s January 6 Evidence From Trump’s January 6 Trial first appeared on Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 5:10 pm by William A. Jacobson
" The post Appeals Court Upholds Most Of Trump Gag Order, But Allows Criticism of Special Counsel Jack Smith first appeared on Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:02 pm by Dennis Aftergut
That is what Jack Smith’s “speaking indictment” is telling us. [read post]
4 May 2024, 9:04 am
"From "Prosecutors: Docs in boxes seized from Mar-a-Lago were inadvertently jumbled/Special counsel Jack Smith’s team acknowledged mischaracterizing the issue at a recent hearing in the Trump classified documents case, but said the reordering was not significant" (Politico). [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 11:21 am
I'm reading "Special Counsel Asks Supreme Court to Decide Whether Trump Is Immune From Prosecution/The request was unusual in two ways: Jack Smith asked the justices to rule before an appeals court acted, and he urged them to move with exceptional speed" (NYT).Why the big rush? [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 2:01 am by Jen Patja Howell
How does this change Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigations? [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 5:34 am
It says in "Four takeaways from Trump's indictment for 2020 election interference" (BBC).That points me to Jonathan Turley's tweets, which I'm reading here:Special Counsel Jack Smith just issued the first criminal indictment of alleged disinformation in my view. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 5:13 pm by lennyesq
Government prosecutors on special counsel Jack Smith’s team file papers asking Judge Aileen Cannonto reconsider her “clear error” in granting a request from lawyers for former President Donald Trump to reveal the identity of certain witnesses in the classified documents case. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 8:38 am by Josh Blackman
Fla.), one of two prosecutions brought against former-President Trump by Special Counsel Jack Smith. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 12:48 pm by Rick Hasen
Fascinating oped from Stephen Weissman: Attorney General Merrick Garland’s appointment of Jack Smith as special counsel to oversee two federal criminal investigations involving former President Donald Trump was praised by some of Smith’s former Justice Department colleagues, who highlighted his… Continue reading The post “Trump special counsel Jack Smith lost the John Edwards case — what might that… [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 12:25 pm by Tabatha Abu El-Haj
Washington Post raises questions about what can be inferred from the decision of Special counsel Jack Smith to withdraw “a subpoena seeking records about fundraising by the political action committee Save America. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 6:57 am by Rick Hasen
Politico: Donald Trump’s effort to assemble false slates of presidential electors in 2020 may wind up shielding special counsel Jack Smith’s case from a Supreme Court ruling that could sharply narrow the obstruction law at the heart of the indictment… Continue reading The post “Jack Smith: False elector scheme saves Trump obstruction charges” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:30 am by James Nault
“Given the weighty and consequential character of the constitutional questions at stake, only this Court can provide the definitive and final resolution” The post Special Counsel Jack Smith Asks Supreme Court to Weigh In on Trump’s Claim of Presidential Immunity from Criminal Prosecution first appeared on Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 5:11 pm by Howard Bashman
The post “Jack Smith and the Supreme Court; The special counsel tries to drag the Justices into his political timetable for the Jan. 6 trial of Donald Trump” appeared first on How Appealing. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 7:25 am by Rick Hasen
The post “How Jack Smith May Charge Trump PAC with Fraudulent Fundraising Within the Bounds of First Amendment” appeared first on Election Law Blog. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 7:07 pm by Howard Bashman
“Supreme Court justices asked to weigh in on Jan. 6 defendants’ cases; Review could affect special counsel Jack Smith’s election case against Trump”: Alex Swoyer of The Washington Times has this report. [read post]