Search for: "Jackson v. Arnold"
Results 1 - 20
of 90
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2024, 5:57 am
Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lord Justices Lewison, Arnold and Birss) Lidl Great Britain Ltd and Another v Tesco Stores Ltd and Another (Rev1) [2024] EWCA Civ 262 (19 March 2024)This is the third of my supplementary articles on Lord Justice Jackson's judgment in Lidl Great Britain Ltd and Another v Tesco Stores Ltd and Another (Rev1) [2024] EWCA Civ 262 (19 March 2024). [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 9:23 am
Author: Paul Hurst Licence CC BY-SA 2.5 Deed Source Wikimedia CommonsJane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lord Justices Lewison, Arnold and Birss) Lidl Great Britain Ltd and Another v Tesco Stores Ltd and Another (Rev1) [2024] EWCA Civ 262 (19 March 2024)This is the second of my supplementary articles on Lord Justice Jackson's judgment in Lidl Great Britain Ltd and Another v Tesco Stores [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
“Know then thyself, presume not God to scan; The proper study of Mankind is Man. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Arnold proved no less enthusiastic about antitrust than Jackson. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am
On 10 May 2023, the Court of Appeal (Peter Jackson, Males and Arnold LJJ) heard an appeal in the case of Stoute v News Group Newspapers Ltd. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 11:35 am
Arnold H. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:00 am
Appeal Judgment Lord Justice Arnold gave the leading judgment in dismissing Rhodia’s appeal, with Lord Justices Peter Jackson and Coulson in agreement. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
The debate in many ways goes back to Justice Holmes’s typically cryptic dissenting opinion in Lochner v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 7:19 am
Great Hall of the People ChongqingAuthor flyerletian Licence CCO 1.0 Soutce Wikimedia Commons Jane LambertCourt of Appeal (Lords Justices Peter Jackson, Arnold and Phillips) Nokia Technologies OY and another v Oneplus Technology (Shenzhen) Co Ltd and others [2022] EWCA Civ 947 (11 July 2022)This was an appeal from the judgment of HH Judge Hacon sitting as a judge of the High Court in Nokia [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:30 am
Arnold. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 12:56 pm
Aimonetti & Jackson A. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:46 am
Van Orden v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 7:02 am
Allegedly, UM violated the FCA when it “billed medically unnecessary tests to Medicare for patients at the Miami Transplant Institute, a kidney transplant program run by UM at Jackson Memorial Hospital (JMH). [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm
[Disclosure: My law firm, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, is among the counsel to the respondent in the Baltimore case. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 4:00 pm
N.J. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 1:44 pm
Jackson, 83 Alb. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 5:43 am
By 2009, Mike Barlow and I were the IP Federation representatives on the Patents Courts User Committee, I recall that I was the representative on the PCC and Mike on the Patents Court but at one point they morphed into one body which considered a new set of rules for the PCC in 2009 at around the time of the Jackson Review on civil litigation costs. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:16 am
On Lam v Arnold Montag Architect 2019 NY Slip Op 30712(U) March 13, 2019 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 522413/2017 Judge: Pamela L. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
17 Feb 2019, 4:06 pm
ICO The ICO blog has a post by Deputy Chief Executive Paul Arnold explaining to small businesses why they need to pay the data protection fee. [read post]
