Search for: "Jackson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue"
Results 21 - 40
of 43
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2015, 1:00 am
Anson v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 October 2014. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 1:00 am
Anson v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 October 2014. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 1:30 am
Anson v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 October 2014. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:11 am
Anson v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 October 2014. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 4:54 am
Anson v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 October 2014. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 7:30 am
Anson v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 October 2014. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:51 am
Anson v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 October 2014. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:15 am
Anson v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 October 2014. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 3:23 am
Anson v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 October 2014. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 5:09 am
Anson v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 27 October 2014. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:13 am
Jackson v Murray & Ors, heard 20 October 2014. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 5:46 pm
Commissioner of Internal Revenue – Portland lawyer Larry Brant of Garvey Schubert Barer on his blog, Larry’s Tax Law Reminder or threat: an insurance company’s intimidation tactics – Seattle attorney Karen Koehler on her blog, The Velvet Hammer Is It Time to Appoint a Discovery Referee? [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 5:11 am
See, Solomon v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 8:38 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent (017152-13 U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:01 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 11-747, appears to be yet another hold for United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:47 pm
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 11-582, is likely being held for United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 10-1553, since the Long Conference. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
The challenged provisions amended the Internal Revenue Code by adding: (1) a "penalty" payable to the Secretary of the Treasury by an individual taxpayer who failed to maintain adequate health insurance coverage and (2) an "assessable payment" payable to the Secretary of the Treasury by a "large employer" if at least on of its employees received a tax credit or government subsidy to offset payments for certain health-related expenses. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 11:56 am
Since CAIP v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
