Search for: "Jackson v. U.s.*" Results 41 - 60 of 741
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Supreme Court Eases the Ability for Employers to Appeal Denials of Motions to Compel Arbitration in Federal Court
5 Jul 2023, 9:31 am by Raymond Nhan and Mahmood Jeewa*
In Coinbase, Inc. v. [read post]
Labor & Employment Law Blog - http://www.laboremploymentlawblog.com/
It’s not As Bad As You Think, Maybe (Guest Post by Professor David B. Owens)
1 Jul 2023, 8:10 am by Michael C. Dorf
 I will admit that I have not spent significant time with Justice Thomas’s concurrence or Justice Jackson’s dissent. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
By a 6-3 vote, the Supreme Court holds that a federal prisoner who has already filed (and exhausted) a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 can’t file another postconviction motion to raise a claim of legal innocence based on an intervening statutory-interpretation-decision of  the Supreme Court.  Section 2255(h) bars second or successive 2255 motions based on non-constitutional claims; and the “saving clause” of § 2255(e) doesn’t authorize a petition for a “writ of habeas corpus,” under § 2241, for claims barred by § 2255(h). Jones v. Hendrix, Sup. Ct.  21-857, __U.S.. __  (June 22, 2023).
27 Jun 2023, 12:31 pm by Darrell Fields
Jackson, J. [read post]
Federal Defenders of New York Blog - http://blog.federaldefendersny.org/
US Supreme Court rules that law criminalizing encouragement of illegal immigration is constitutional
24 Jun 2023, 3:36 pm by Rebekah Yeager-Malkin | U. Pittsburgh School of Law, US
The US Supreme Court ruled Friday in US v. [read post]
JURIST - Paper Chase - https://www.jurist.org/news/
Supreme Court holds that a 924(j) conviction does not require a consecutive sentence.
23 Jun 2023, 12:31 pm by Barry Leiwant
In Lora v. [read post]
Federal Defenders of New York Blog - http://blog.federaldefendersny.org/
Court blocks pathway for federal prisoners to raise legal innocence claims
23 Jun 2023, 6:37 am by Noam Biale
The court’s decision in Jones v. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
En Passant Suspension Clause Originalism in Jones v. Hendrix
22 Jun 2023, 9:28 am by Michael C. Dorf
In Jones v. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
U.S. Supreme Court Vindicates Photographer But Destabilizes Fair Use — Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (Guest Blog Post)
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am by Eric Goldman
  Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
Upcoming Supreme Court Case Threatens Congressional Subpoena Power
20 Jun 2023, 5:58 am by Michael Stern
In Anderson v. [read post]
Lawfare - http://www.lawfareblog.com/
Supreme Court Rules “That Dog Don’t Hunt”: Bad Spaniels Toy’s Use of JACK DANIELS Marks is a Poor Parody and Dilution Act Applies
16 Jun 2023, 12:04 pm by Ted Max
 Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]
Ad Briefs: Covering Your Ads - http://www.coveringyourads.com/
Supreme Court Rules “That Dog Don’t Hunt”: Bad Spaniels Toy’s Use of JACK DANIELS Marks is a Poor Parody and Dilution Act Applies
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am by Ted Max
 Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]
Intellectual Property Law Blog - http://www.intellectualpropertylawblog.com/
Supreme Court Rules “That Dog Don’t Hunt”: Bad Spaniels Toy’s Use of JACK DANIELS Marks is a Poor Parody and Dilution Act Applies
16 Jun 2023, 11:46 am by Ted Max
 Justice Alito, on the other hand, questioned whether any reasonable consumer would assume the Bad Spaniels toy, even with its references to dog excrement, would have anything to do with Jack Daniels.[7] Justice Brown Jackson questioned whether the Rogers v. [read post]
Art Law Gallery - https://www.artlawgallery.com/
Adverse employment actions - the Supreme Court is being asked to examine this issue
12 Jun 2023, 8:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
” Jackson v. [read post]
Wait A Second! - http://secondcircuitcivilrights.blogspot.com/
[Stephen Halbrook] Second Amendment Roundup: Third Circuit Rules Felon Ban Invalid as Applied
11 Jun 2023, 7:22 pm by Stephen Halbrook
  Last month, in United States v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Court endorses private Section 1983 enforcement of spending clause enactments
8 Jun 2023, 11:03 pm by Howard M. Wasserman
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote for a seven-justice majority. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/
Supreme Court Finds Warhol’s Commercial Licensing of “Orange Prince” to Vanity Fair Is Not Fair Use and Infringes Goldsmith’s Famed Rock Photo
6 Jun 2023, 9:50 am by Ted Max and Joseph Ireland
[17] Slip op. 2 (quoting Google LLC v. [read post]
Retail Trend Spotter - https://www.retailtrendspotter.com/
Supreme Court Finds Warhol’s Commercial Licensing of “Orange Prince” to Vanity Fair Is Not Fair Use and Infringes Goldsmith’s Famed Rock Photo
5 Jun 2023, 11:49 am by Ted Max and Joseph Ireland
[17] Slip op. 2 (quoting Google LLC v. [read post]
Ad Briefs: Covering Your Ads - http://www.coveringyourads.com/
Supreme Court Finds Warhol’s Commercial Licensing of “Orange Prince” to Vanity Fair Is Not Fair Use and Infringes Goldsmith’s Famed Rock Photo
5 Jun 2023, 11:39 am by Ted Max and Joseph Ireland
[17] Slip op. 2 (quoting Google LLC v. [read post]
Intellectual Property Law Blog - http://www.intellectualpropertylawblog.com/
The President and A Public Debt Emergency – Lincoln’s Precedent, by Alissa Ardito Ashcroft
31 May 2023, 2:01 pm by Guest Author
The President would not need to justify his action solely on inherent executive authority, though the argument would doubtless partake of Jackson’s zones in Youngstown.[22] The President might also argue that he has an implicit authorization to honor commitments in [read post]
Notice & Comment - https://www.yalejreg.com/nc/
Supreme Court Finds Warhol’s Commercial Licensing of “Orange Prince” to Vanity Fair Is Not Fair Use and Infringes Goldsmith’s Famed Rock Photo
26 May 2023, 10:56 am by Ted Max and Joseph Ireland
[17] Slip op. 2 (quoting Google LLC v. [read post]
Art Law Gallery - https://www.artlawgallery.com/