Search for: "Jacob v. Roberts" Results 121 - 140 of 411
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
(Center for History and Economics, Harvard University)Moderators: Elizabeth Lhost, Dartmouth College (elizabeth.d.lhost@dartmouth.edu) and Emma Rothschild, Harvard University (rothsch@fas.harvard.edu)Convener: Kalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Debjani Bhattacharya, Drexel University (db893@drexel.edu) South Asia 1Julia Stephens, Rutgers University (julia.stephens@rutgers.edu) South Asia 2Tatiana Seijas, Rutgers University… [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 9:51 am by Barbara Lichman
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania, 588 U.S. ___ (2019), the court majority (consisting of Roberts, Alito, Gorsuch, Thomas and Kavanaugh) ruled that property owners may bring Fifth Amendment claims for compensation as soon as their property has been taken, “regardless of any post-taking remedies that may be available to the property owner,” citing Jacobs v. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:32 am by Miriam Seifter
” The majority roots its interpretation in precedent, specifically Jacobs v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Panel - Feminist Perspectives on Health Law and Bioethics Moderator – Lindsay Wiley, American University Washington College of Law, Feminist Health Justice Greer Donley, University of Pittsburgh School of Law, Regulation of Encapsulated Placenta Seema Mohapatra, Indiana University School of Law, Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Health Law Opinions Jessica Roberts, University of Houston Law Center, Reclaiming Rights in Genetic Data as Feminist F. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 8:37 am by Jon Levitan and Andrew Hamm
She also released three opinions, including in one case, Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
At Fox News, Caleb Parke reports that the court’s decision in The American Legion v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co… [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
IPSO Rulings 06939-18 Thorne v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2018), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication 06786-18 Crick v The Sunday Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach – after investigation 06759-18 Jefferd v Daily Express, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach – after investigation 06758-18 Jefferd v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2018), No breach – after investigation 06720-18 Johnson v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2018),… [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:04 am
McIntosh, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Thursday, February 7, 2019 Tags: Accounting, Accounting standards, Board oversight, Boards of Directors, Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Financial reporting, GAAP, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities enforcement, Securities regulation Amicus Brief of Law and Finance Professors in Verition Partners v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer; Tauluseinä Tavelväggen, Wall of Printings (1977); Nörrköping Art Museum Turku Findland))Every year for almost 25 years, the Corporate Practice Commentator (with great thanks to Robert Thompson (Georgetown)) announces the results of its annual poll to select the ten best corporate and securities articles. [read post]
26 Jan 2019, 6:51 am by Randall Hodgkinson
Robert Weber, No. 113,472 (Sedgwick)Sentencing appeal (petition for review)Peter Maharry[Affirmed; Biles; June 14, 2019]Improper classification of prior convictionState v. [read post]