Search for: "Jacobi v Deni"
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2022, 11:14 am
Jacoby (9th Cir. 2002) concluded that the Act applies to access to public address systems, even though that's not literally a "meeting," though Herdahl v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 6:12 am
The judge denied plaintiff’s application. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:51 am
Jacoby v. [read post]
23 Jan 2021, 2:53 pm
To my mind, New Hampshire v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 3:59 am
This blog’s analysis of Monday’s decision in GE Energy Power Conversion v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 4:20 am
” At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag analyze the “clarifying” reargument in Knick v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 6:30 am
At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag analyze the recent oral argument and predict a win for the challengers in Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:04 am
” Briefly: At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag “predict a unique alliance” based on last week’s oral argument in Gundy v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 4:49 am
[USA] v Johnston, 145 AD3d 1240, 1240 [2016]; Matter of Barnes v Venettozzi, 135 AD3d 1250, 1251 [2016]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d 1183, 1184-1185 [2015], lv denied 25 NY3d 912 [2015]). [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:18 am
Matter of Garraway v Fischer, 106 AD3d 1301, 1301 [2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 864 [2013]; Eklund v Pinkey, 27 AD3d 878, 879 [2006]). [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:35 am
Matter of Garraway v Fischer, 106 AD3d 1301, 1301 [2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 864 [2013]; Eklund v Pinkey, 27 AD3d 878, 879 [2006]). [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 7:34 am
Jacoby v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 4:24 am
Supreme Court, seeking attorney fees the Arkansas Supreme Court has denied. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 4:25 am
Matter of Garraway v Fischer, 106 AD3d 1301, 1301 [2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 864 [2013]; Eklund v Pinkey, 27 AD3d 878, 879 [2006]). [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:23 am
The court denied the motion to enlarge the time to make a posttrial motion, and denied the posttrial motion, in effect, as untimely. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am
Any general claims about distinctiveness must take into account: eligibility for protection/scope of protection; reality v. policy; words v. non-words; perception by single consumers v. aggregate; consumer search costs approach v. product goodwill approach; US v. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:41 am
IMatthew David Brozik blogged here about Tiffany v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 11:02 am
The motions were denied in January 2014. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:13 am
Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:43 am
In Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, a client was injured in a rear-end car accident and subsequently retained a lawyer to represent him in a case against the other driver. [read post]
