Search for: "Jacobs v. Cook" Results 1 - 20 of 82
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 4:02 pm by Henry P Yang
 The third panel (photo: Neil Graveney)Trevor Cook (photo: Neil Graveney)Trevor Cook recalled that 20 years ago his team appealed to the House of Lords in Kirin-Amgen. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 9:47 am by Unknown
” The court determined that Jacobs does not apply in this case.In Jacobs, the court stated, the defendant was an out-of-state agent acting on behalf of Oregon residents who were the sellers of the investment. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 12:57 pm by Victoria Gallegos
Rubenstein analyzed the potential impact of Texas v. [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:48 am by Sophie Corke
In line with Lord Justice Jacob’s point in Actavis v Merck, the Court of Appeal stated that – in certain circumstances – there is nothing inventive about routinely-taken steps even if the actual outcome had not been predicted. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Cook, John Malcolm, Zac Bolitho, Bennett L. [read post]