Search for: "Jacobs v. Marks"
Results 141 - 160
of 563
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2019, 2:58 am
[Ilya Shapiro and Dennis Garcia on Cato merits brief in Supreme Court case of Espinosa v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 5:56 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Florida v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 3:28 am
KG v OHIM, Wedl & Hofmann GmbH. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 10:48 pm
Sir Robin rounded the event off by giving Lord Neuberger a speech to mark his retirement from the UK Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 10:55 am
The fifth board of Appeal rejected the request for invaliditation of the Polo/Lauren Logo as it was based only upon an industrial design right which ceased to be valid due to its not renewal.In CJEU: "EZMIX" devoid of distinctive character and descriptive for software used in music production Nedim Malovic reports on the CJEU's decision in C-48/18, underlying that once again the CJEU made it cleat that only decisions on point of law may be subject to appeal to the Court.If you… [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 10:47 am
And Robert Loeb and Cesar Lopez-Morales wrote about United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:09 am
Lord Mance also agreed, save for a short reservation of his opinion as to the pertinence of the distinction between intellectual property rights (IPRs) for which one must apply (such as patents and registered trade marks) as against those which subsist without registration (such as copyright). [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 4:49 pm
The application was published in 1996, and Remington opposed it under ss.3(1)(a) and (b), 3(2) and 3(3).Once Jacob J found the mark to be invalid, Remington argued that for Philips to continue to resist the opposition on the 3D mark was res judicata, and hence an abuse of process. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 1:22 am
In Case C-334/05 P OHIM v Shaker di L. [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 7:20 am
The Board unconvincingly distinguished Jacobs v. [read post]
26 Nov 2016, 1:30 am
Other Research MethodsModels in medicine (Michael Wilde & Jon Williamson)Discovery in medicine (Brendan Clarke)Explanation in medicine (Mael Lemoine)The case study in medicine (Rachel Ankeny)Values in medical research (Kirstin Borgersen)Outcome measures in medicine (Leah McClimans)Measuring harms (Jacob Stegenga)Expert consensus (Miriam Solomon) PART IV: CLINICAL METHODSClinical judgment (Ross Upshur & Benjamin Chin-Yee)Narrative medicine (Danielle Spencer)Medical decision making:… [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 1:01 am
In Fletcher v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 73 [week ending on Sunday 22 November] – Xmas present from Benelux PTO | Eponia never ending troubles | Prof Dr Siegfried Broß v EPO | Protection of formats in the Netherlands | Eponia never ending proceedings | UK intensifies its Cracking Ideas programme | Anne Frank's Diary copyright | Transport for London and IP | CJEU in SBS Belgium v SABAM Case… [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 9:34 pm
The main course is a double-headed talk by Lord Justice Jacob (who needs neither introduction nor explanation) and Mark Bezant (LECG) on "Remedies or Headaches? [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:32 am
Jacobs, M.D., Debra C. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Jacobs of Greenwire and Tony Mauro of the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required). [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:41 am
To summarize one can quote Justice Jacob in the case's first appeal in the High Court: "...the mere fact that websites can be accessed anywhere in the world does not mean, for trade mark purposes that the law should be regarded as being used everywhere in the world. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 5:11 am
He then cited Reed Executive plc v Reed Business Information Ltd [2004] RPC 40 in which Jacob LJ explained that there was a distinction in law between an assumption on behalf of the relevant public and a wondering on their part. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:33 am
Factory Five Racing, Inc. v. [read post]
