Search for: "Jacobs v. State of Mississippi*"
Results 21 - 40
of 51
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2018, 2:35 pm
Article III simply declines to abrogate certain State immunities from suit, see Hans v. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 3:55 am
Jacob M. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 3:55 am
Jacob M. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am
The Supreme Court’s 1992 Quill Corp. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 5:25 am
Spire, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
As many LHB readers are aware, the Law and Society Association hosts "Collaborative Research Networks" that sponsors panels for its annual meeting. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am
So you went to law school right as a generation of legal thinkers was persuading people, bit by bit, that both judicial activism and restraint were misguided, and that courts can and must enforce constitutional limits on the state. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 6:04 am
Cotton, 572 U.S. ___, 134 S.Ct. 1861, 1863 (2014); Jacobs v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
United States, 14-150; potential blockbuster Friedrichs v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
This generally hostile reception contrasts with the way many state supreme courts in the 1950s and 60s quickly adopted Berman v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Tyne v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Rothrock v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 5:35 am
United States, the Court limited the availability of enhanced sentences for drug dealers whose customers die or suffer serious injuries. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:46 am
Jacobs of Greenwire covers yesterday’s oral argument in the property rights case Marvin M. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Md. 2012) (same); New York State Pesticide Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 7:21 am
State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 2:13 pm
Jacobs Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 7:05 am
Looking ahead to oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 1:47 pm
On October 18, 2012, in Windsor v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
The high court’s refusal to consider Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. v. [read post]
