Search for: "Jacobs v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 927
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2017, 2:25 pm by Jon Sands
  The government therefore failed to show that he intended to remain in the United States. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 6:22 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
A few months ago, the Court of Appeals said that a man could sue the United States Attorney General for constitutional violations resulting from his restrictive detention on account of his ethnic background. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Joy Milligan and Bertrall Ross, UVA Law, “discuss how we should interpret a Constitution that was not written for or drafted by ‘We the People,” on the Sidebar podcast.Prairie View A&M history professor Ronald Goodwin discussed the early Republic and how Americans tried to define equality and interpret the Constitution in the first decades of the United States. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 5:40 am
Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]), the CFAA does not encompass Jacob's misappropriation of information that he lawfully accessed while working for plaintiffs or misuse of work computers in violation of their computer policies (see United States v Nosal, 676 F3d 854 [9th Cir. 2012]; see also University Sports Publs. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:47 am by Eugene Volokh
Thomas Porteous, Jr., while a Federal judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, engaged in a pattern of conduct that is incompatible with the trust and confidence placed in him as a Federal judge, as follows: Judge Porteous, while presiding as a United States district judge in Lifemark Hospitals of Louisiana, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 7:59 am by Allison Trzop
” At The Originalism Blog, Chris Green discusses whether the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group has standing to defend the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 11:00 pm by Mary Mock
In the 1930s, waves of Jewish and Catholic immigrants arrived in the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 8:03 am by Ashby Jones
The clause, which has lain dormant for 135 years, states: “No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 9:23 am by Timothy D. Tremba
On May 26, 2016, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued its decision in Lewis v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:30 am by Tia Sewell, Anna Salvatore
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s Sept. 2 decision on United States v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Beydoun, Electing Islamophobia, (March 6, 2016).Lloyd Hitoshi Mayer, Fragmented Oversight of Nonprofits in the United States: Does it Work? [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm by Ilya Somin
The expert near-consensus on this subject is backed by longstanding Supreme Court precedent, going back to United States v. [read post]