Search for: "Jamal Greene"
Results 1 - 20
of 188
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2025, 8:00 am
… “If anyone is being detained or removed based on the administration’s assertion that it can do so without judicial review or due process,” said Jamal Greene, a law professor at Columbia, “the president is asserting dictatorial power and ‘constitutional crisis’ doesn’t capture the gravity of the situation. [read post]
15 Mar 2025, 2:29 pm
By Kate Andrias, Jessica Bulman-Pozen, Jamal Greene, Olatunde Johnson, Jeremy Kessler, Gillian Metzger, and David Pozen On Thursday, the president of Columbia University received a remarkable letter from the General Services Administration, the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Department of Education. [read post]
16 Feb 2025, 3:49 pm
Jamal Greene, Columbia Law School Prof. [read post]
15 Feb 2025, 9:54 am
Jamal Greene, Professor of Constitutional Law at Columbia, discusses that at KQED. [read post]
5 Feb 2025, 8:08 am
Criminal procedure — Voir dire question — Judicial discretion Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Tavon Green, Jr., the appellant, was convicted of first-degree murder, […] [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Introduction Sometimes a case is referred to as "canonical. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
Indeed, it rarely appears in stories about the bad things the Court has done, no matter how bad they have been.For example, Columbia law professor Jamal Greene avoids this language when discussing decisions like Dred Scott v. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 1:06 pm
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 10:51 am
On Thursday, the Supreme Court decided SEC v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 6:30 am
” Yet prior to the 1960s, as Jamal Greene has shown, Dred Scott did not begin to occupy a position in a constitutional law anti-canon.[5] The publication in 1978 of Don Fehrenbacher’s highly influential book, The Dred Scott Case, cemented a new conventional wisdom that Chief Justice Roger Taney’s opinion was an “extraordinary cumulation of error, inconsistency, and misrepresentation” and “a gross perversion of the facts. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 1:10 pm
Jamal Greene appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 8:55 pm
Here is the abstract: In How Rights Went Wrong, Jamal Greene criticizes the rights absolutism that animates our constitutional jurisprudence. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 4:05 pm
Here is the abstract: In How Rights Went Wrong, Jamal Greene criticizes the rights absolutism that animates our constitutional jurisprudence. [read post]
4 May 2023, 6:26 am
With contributions from a diverse group of experts including Jack Balkin, Emily Bazelon, Hillary Clinton, Jamal Greene, Amy Klobuchar, Newt Minow, Cass Sunstein, Sheldon Whitehouse, among others, the volume provides a comprehensive examination of the future of free speech in the increasingly contentious environment of social media. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
(2021) Donald Drakeman, The Hollow Core of Constitutional Theory: Why We Need the Framers (2021) Jamal Greene, How Rights Went Wrong: Why Our Obsession With Rights is Tearing America Apart (2021) David Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 5:45 am
Marjorie Taylor Greene. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Magness, “Tenured Radicals Are Real,” Chronicle of Higher Education (2020) Justin McBrayer, “Diversity Statements are the New Faith Statements,” Inside Higher Education (2022) Brian Soucek, “How to Protect Diversity Statements from Legal Peril,” Chronicle of Higher Education (2022) Brian Leiter, “Diversity Statements are Still in Legal Peril,” Chronicle of Higher Education (2022) Clifford Ando, “Princeton Betrays Its Principles,” Chronicle… [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm
Law professor at Columbia Law School, Jamal Greene, wrote that the legal question the Court presented—whether the Colorado anti-discrimination law impermissibly forces the web designer “to speak or stay silent”—is “too broad. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 12:10 pm
In his Foreword to the 2018 Harvard Law Review Supreme Court issue, Jamal Greene analogously draws upon Canadian constitutional law to illuminate aspects of U.S. constitutional law we often oversee and take for granted. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
” became a term of denunciation, Jamal Greene shows, as both liberals and conservatives united in their repudiation of the case. [read post]
