Search for: "James Chambers v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 299
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jan 2017, 4:41 pm
United Kingdom, the workplace surveillance was predicated upon suspicions of criminal activity, and in Copland v. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 1:32 pm
Fairhurst, Justice James M. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:59 am
See also United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 1:44 am
In this post, Clare Montgomery KC of Matrix Chambers comments on the decision in Craig v Her Majesty’s Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) and another (Scotland) [2022] UKSC 6. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 6:55 pm
Second, Chambers argued that because the Supreme Court recently acknowledged in James v. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
Chambers and his founding partners, James E. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 12:20 pm
Maryland, will be held Thursday, October 9, 2014 at 6:00 pm in the Chamber of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 5:49 pm
Chambers and his founding partners, James E. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:16 am
On Tuesday the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the case of Mosley v United Kingdom. [read post]
1 May 2008, 5:24 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 10:20 am
See James v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 3:59 am
(“”Sears”) (collectively “Defendants”) in the United States District Court for the Central District of California (styled Steve Chambers, Lynn Van Der Veer, David Brown, Bach-Tuyet Brown, Kevin O’Donnell, Joseph Cicchelli, Kurt Himler, Susan Milicia, Gary LeBlanc and James Cashman v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 5:44 am
See Chamber of Commerce, et al v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 4:52 pm
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
On Friday District of Columbia District Court Judge James Boasberg issued an opinion reaffirming his ruling striking down the National Labor Relations Board's "quickie election" rules in Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:06 pm
District Judge James C. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am
Justice Clark read his opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:06 am
Ireland and the United Kingdom both submitted third-party comments in TV Vest v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 12:32 pm
The following year, in Chambers v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:16 am
The National Labor Relations Board filed a Motion to Amend or Alter Judgment yesterday in Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v NLRB, Civil Action No. 11-2262, where District of Columbia District Court Judge James Boasberg struck down the NLRB's "quickie election" rules because the NLRB lacked a quorum when it passed the new rules. [read post]
