Search for: "James Eady"
Results 1 - 20
of 90
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2023, 12:32 pm
In this current appeal being heard at the Supreme Court, James Eadie (representing the Home Office) disagreed with the Court of Appeal result, arguing that the scheme is both lawful and safe. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 3:34 am
As it had been previously ordered that the issue of the court’s jurisdiction to hear the Reference should be rolled up with submissions on the substance of the Reference, the Advocate General (Sir James Eadie KC appearing) continued dealing with the jurisdiction issue before moving onto the substance. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 12:50 am
The Advocate General’s submissions (partly heard) Sir James Eadie KC appeared on behalf of the Advocate General, and his written case can be found here. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 4:32 am
The respondents’ arguments The respondents to the appeal were the original parties to the case, the Executors of the will (the law firm Farrer & Co) represented by Jonathan Crow QC, and the Attorney General, represented by Sir James Eadie QC. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 4:32 pm
” The judge struck out the defence of truth, accepting the claimant’s argument that saying that the law firm was a “scam solicitor” was an allegation of dishonesty – and therefore, following the decision of Sir David Eady in Wasserman v Freilich ([2016] EWHC 312 (QB)), was a factual allegation. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 4:27 pm
I will cite only one other egregious example to add to the Flood case; that of Colonel Campbell-James, who was wrongly accused by the Guardian of being involved in the appalling abuse of Iraqi prisoners in the Abu Ghraib jail. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
It would have risked losing time, in circumstances in which time is already a limited resource. 1220: Lord Garnier QC turns to consider political motives and to counter Sir James Eadie QC’s submissions made on behalf of the Prime Minister. 1215: Lord Garnier QC says there is a “world of difference” between dissolution and prorogation. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
Hello and welcome to day two of the live blog of the appeals concerning the lawfulness of the current prorogation of the UK Parliament. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether… [read post]
5 May 2019, 4:41 pm
Newspapers, Journalism and Regulation James Ball has a piece on Journalism.co.uk entitled “The hidden threats in taming tech by law”. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 4:18 am
Then the Government joined in, instructing James Eadie QC to intervene in support of the appeal. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 4:32 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgment after a public hearing in a media law case is outstanding: Kennedy v The National Trust for Scotland, heard 21 November 2017 (Sir David Eady). [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 5:31 pm
There was also a costs hearing in the case of Decker v Hopcraft before Sir David Eady. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:16 pm
In an unusual Part 8 claim Master Davison has ordered Express newspapers to publish an apology to James Ellison. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:00 am
The MPS brought in Lord Pannick QC to lead on the appeal whilst the Home Secretary intervened and instructed James Eadie QC. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
On 29 June 2017 Sir David Eady heard an appeal in the slander case of Otu v Morley and decided that the Master had not made a final determination on the defendant’s summary judgment application. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:17 pm
At the time when the world was reeling in the face of the lurid footage of the vile abuse of Iraqi prisoners by the US military that a distinguished British Army officer, Colonel Campbell-James, was accused in an article published by the Guardian of being complicit in the abuse of prisoners at Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:19 pm
Ed Miliband and Vince Cable have also called for the bid to be halted because of James Murdoch’s continued role in his father’s media empire. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 5:31 am
It has been reported that the Government was already working on a short bill in advance of the hearing and James Eadie QC, in his submissions on Day 2 of the appeal, appeared to confirm the Government’s plan: “If the Supreme Court decides against our arguments here, the solution in legal terms is a one-line act. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Eadie QC agrees. 15.10 Eadie QC submits that Parliament can control Government’s prerogative powers, and what legal effect can be attached to the exercise of those powers. [read post]
