Search for: "James H. v. ADES" Results 1 - 20 of 317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2008, 9:31 pm
As related in this ILB entry earlier this afternoon, the COA today decided in a very brief ruling in the case of James H. [read post]
27 Apr 2013, 4:33 am by Dennis Crouch
Undertaking this lengthy and complex analysis, he determines that, by and large, Motorola's patented technology added relatively little to either the H.264 or 802.11 standards or to Microsoft's products (e.g., Paras. 289, 299, 384, 394, 457, etc.) [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 12:46 pm by Eric Goldman
Feb. 22, 2016) H/T Rebecca Tushnet Related Posts on Keyword Advertising * Another Murky Opinion on Lawyers Buying Keyword Ads on Other Lawyers’ Names–In re Naert * Keyword Ad Lawsuit Isn’t Covered By California’s Anti-SLAPP Law * Confusion From Competitive Keyword Advertising? [read post]