Search for: "James v. Edwards"
Results 1 - 20
of 845
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2024, 10:12 am
Donnelley, Corp., 368 F.3d 123 (2d Cir. 2004) (“materially significant disadvantage”); James v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:26 am
Alexei V. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Whether you’re here in person or participating virtually from around the country, or even overseas, I thank you for joining us. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
See, e.g., Kidder, Peabody & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:56 am
Additionally, as a member of the Debevoise team, Nawi prepared an amicus brief for Henry v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
When Taft assumed the chief justiceship the previous year, the Court was a relatively moderate right-of-center body, as only Justices James C. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:39 pm
In Edwards v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
The Union County Board of County Commissioners is hosting Gibbons v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
., Lochner v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 5:12 am
" United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:21 pm
Class V. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 8:53 am
Mata v. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 8:35 am
And the Court just granted cert in another equity case, Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:54 am
Lancaster, __ N.C. __, 895 S.E.2d 337 (2023), concerns an offense first codified in 1328 during the reign of Edward III. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 4:19 pm
Perhaps more interestingly, and certainly to me at the time, it was when the defendant distributors tried to strike out his libel claim against them on the grounds of abuse of process (Goldsmith v Sperring [1977] EWCA Civ J0223-1) in the appeal presided over by Lord Denning MR that Bridge LJ, with whom Scarman LJ expressly agreed, publicly chastised the Master of the Rolls as follows: “The Legal Liability of the Distributors. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:21 am
(Cohen, v. 2, p. 9.) [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 5:51 am
From State v. [read post]
