Search for: "James v. Jane" Results 81 - 100 of 301
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2019, 10:16 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  However, Court said it wasn’t calling into question legality of health and safety warnings long considered permissible.Panelists: Jane Bambauer, Professor of Law, James E. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am by John Elwood
Jane Doe 2, 18-677, and Trump v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
James Matthew Simon had been convicted of possession of a rifle and ammunition but successfully argued that he had a right to hunt as set out in the 1752 Peace and Friendship Treaty. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:47 am by William Ford
James Jeffrey, the U.S. special representative for Syria engagement, will then deliver keynote remarks. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 9:00 am by Josh Blackman
In contrast, the independent-counsel statute at issue in Morrison v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by msatta
Board of Education or how we got to Obergefell v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 11:03 am by William Ford
Early last week, President Trump met with Chief of Staff John Kelly, Defense Secretary James Mattis, and national security adviser H.R. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Hill, James Gottry weighs in on Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:38 am by Andrew Koppelman
  There has been some very good scholarship and journalism, notably by Theda Skocpol and Jane Mayer, exploring that question. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Clara Chan, Chronicle of Higher Education; Jane Stancill, News and Observer; Ana Irizarry, UNC Daily Tarheel; James G. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
In name of suicide prevention, Oregon plans to use emergency one-sided hearsay proceedings to take away gun rights [Christian Britschgi, Reason] Past Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) readings of Emoluments Clause fall between extreme positions of CREW on the one hand and Trump White House on the other [Jane Chong/Lawfare, earlier] “Yes, Justice Thomas, the doctrine of regulatory takings is originalist” [James Burling, PLF] On the Court’s decision in Murr… [read post]